Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Redskins' name is not offensive [Letter]

I have read the editorial in The Sun about the "people" who are calling the Washington Redskins' name racists. Fine. ("Washington's offensive line," June 20.)

My question is, who are these people, where are they and how many of them are there?

The Washington Redskins team holds these Native Americans up as great people of much honor. That has always been their credo.

So my suggestion to The Sun and all the other people saying the name is "racist" is to get your data correct because what you are saying is not so. There have been investigators who have talked with the Native Americans, and they don't have a problem with the name.

R. Ails, Joppa

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Don't use a derogatory name for a football team [Letter]

    Don't use a derogatory name for a football team [Letter]

    I have a suggestion concerning the Redskins debate ("Facts and logic say rename Redskins," June 27), and I invite that football team to consider my little game.

  • Turn Redskins into Braves [Letter]

    Turn Redskins into Braves [Letter]

    Wikipedia notes that although the connotation of the term Redskins is debatable, the term is defined in current dictionaries of American English as "usually offensive, disparaging, insulting, and taboo" ("Facts and logic say rename Redskins," June 27).