Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

City's 'rain tax' is a shell game to cover the unsustainable structural deficit

Baltimore City Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has proposed to use a substantial portion of stormwater fee revenues — the "rain tax" — to lower the city's overwhelmingly high property tax ("Faceoff over city water fee plan," May 6).

The mayor's relentless assaults on city residents in an attempt to generate ever more tax revenue to cover the major cause of its financial problems — namely its expenditure of 20 percent of revenues on retirees — are not even thinly veiled anymore.

The city's large tax and fee increases, including speed cameras, trash fees and now the rain tax, have been enacted in an attempt to lower the property tax without a corresponding reduction in city expenditures and are nothing more than a shell game.

The discussion of stormwater fees centers around the political mandate that we'll solve the water quality problem in the Chesapeake Bay by collecting more taxes. What is missing from the discussion is what the government actually plans to do to clean up the water.

It isn't as if municipalities haven't been managing the problem of stormwater runoff for the last 30 years. Sadly, there isn't much new with handling it today. One article stated that a new idea was to create marshland to help mitigate pollutants in stormwater runoff. Does anyone really think there are going to be large, newly created marshlands in densely populated urban areas like Baltimore City?

It's difficult to rationally justify bogus new charges to taxpayers — and thus there hasn't been any substantive effort to do so by politicians.

Ultimately the rain tax in Baltimore City is just part of a political shell game and will have little effect in cleaning up the bay, where under-performing sewage treatment plants and industrial discharge are as big a problem as stormwater runoff.

The mayor seems unwilling to tackle the city's big problem, namely a restructuring of the unsustainable level of current pension expense. Instead she is content to play a game of lowering property tax rates and increasing every other conceivable source of revenue.

Gary Moyer, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Hogan's 'rain tax' straw man

      Hogan's 'rain tax' straw man

      Webster's defines a "straw man" as "an argument or opponent set up so as to be easily refuted or defeated." We can find no better example than Gov. Larry Hogan's crusade against what he calls Maryland's "rain tax," which led this week to his introduction of legislation to repeal a law that he claims...

    • Rain tax deserves a real repeal

      Rain tax deserves a real repeal

      Boy, talk about a slanted, biased editorial ("Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater," April 2). An issue that, if done truthfully, could have been summed up in a paragraph was turned into a diatribe about how misguided the voters are.

    • Rain tax still isn't justified

      Rain tax still isn't justified

      Regarding The Sun's editorial on the stormwater management fee ("Carroll talks sense on stormwater," April 3), let's first explain Gov. Larry Hogan's position in my opinion. He proposed to get rid of the "rain tax," the legislature voted that down and proposed their own biased solution as offered...

    • Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater

      Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater

      If there were any doubt that the drive to repeal Maryland's stormwater management fee, AKA "rain tax," is all politics and no substance, it was erased Wednesday when Carroll County, the jurisdiction that has fought hardest against the levy, balked at a bill to repeal it. That's right. Carroll's...

    • Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

      Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

      I have always acted in an environmentally sound way in how I treat rainwater. I have never owned a house where rain water left my property. Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters ("Miller storm-water fee bill advances in Senate," March 19)?

    • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

      Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

      In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations —...

    • Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

      Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

      When we built our house in Anne Arundel County in 2002, we had to install a $10,000 wastewater management system because we were building within 1,000 feet of a body of water. We found this to be unreasonable but we had no appeal. We were certain that we qualified for an exemption now from the...

    • In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

      In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

      I was disheartened to read that both Republican and Democratic legislators are already making plans to repeal the stormwater management fees designed to pay for projects that mitigate the only source of Chesapeake Bay pollution that is still on the rise ("After Hogan victory, local governments...

    Comments
    Loading

    72°