Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Keep Baltimore promenade dream alive

In the summer of 1989, the Baltimore Harbor Promenade opened officially. It began with a 3-mile walk from the Canton Waterfront Park and concluded at Rash Field in the Inner Harbor. "The Promenade was designed as a permanent public pedestrian walkway with accompanying landscaping along the harbor's edge. When completed, it was to be 7.5 miles long and reach the Baltimore Museum of Industry." That quote came from Mayor Kurt Schmoke's administration.

The Promenade in 2013 remains public property along the waterfront edges of Baltimore's Inner Harbor, but many questions still remain about its future. A recent article in The Sun relates how the Waterfront Partnership will now be extending to Fells Point and the obvious benefits that will take place because of this move ("Waterfront Partnership extending into Fells Pt.," May 30). However, it is important to point out that the Waterfront Partnership covers only the Merchant's Promenade where the businesses are located. It does not cover the entire promenade nor does it address the question as to where the promenade will end. Will it stop at the Baltimore Museum of Industry or will it go further to the Under Armour property and possibly all the way (as most of us would like to see) to Fort McHenry? The answer to this question should not lie entirely with the Waterfront Partnership or else the people's interest will not be fully represented

In a commentary published two years ago, David Benn proposed a continuous waterfront parkway from Canton to Fort McHenry that would be the "people's park," much like Central Park in New York. Frederick Law Olmsted's idea was to build Central Park for the "common man" to help offset the dehumanizing aspects of city life. Citizens in Baltimore need to understand this treasure that they have as public property along the waterfront and work toward seeing the walkway completed. The Promenade should be under the control of the Baltimore City Planning Department and not assumed to be under the Waterfront Partnership.

Raymond D. Bahr, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The strength of downtown [Editorial]

    The strength of downtown [Editorial]

    Our view: T. Rowe Price's decision to stay in its Pratt Street headquarters is a reminder of the central business district's vibrancy

  • Harbor Point does not need more studies [Letter]

    Harbor Point does not need more studies [Letter]

    The recent commentary, "Harbor Point environmental questions," (Dec. 2), may lead The Sun's readers to believe that additional studies are necessary before work can begin on the proposed redevelopment there. In fact, these suggested studies have nothing to with the proposed redevelopment, which...

  • Red Line poses health threat, too [Letter]

    Red Line poses health threat, too [Letter]

    The recent commentary concerning Harbor Point and the hexavalent chromium clearly describes the potential harm to the surrounding residents, but there is another issue that should be of a greater concern ("Harbor Point environmental questions," Dec. 2).

  • Make Exelon building a real landmark

    Make Exelon building a real landmark

    The Baltimore City Urban Design and Architectural Review Panel should agree to the request to redesign the Exelon Corporation building at Harbor Point made by the developer ("Developer proposes to convert some Exelon office space to apartments," Sept. 27) upon one condition — that they build the...

  • Harbor Point and the city's low expectations

    Harbor Point and the city's low expectations

    The principles articulated by Michael Fox and Rachel Kutler ("Harbor Point and 'fair development,'" Sept. 13) are refreshing and thought-provoking. Why do we citizens not demand more accountability from developers?

  • Health hazards at former Allied Chemical site

    Health hazards at former Allied Chemical site

    I can't believe developer Marco Greenberg's quote in reference to the former Allied Chemical site and the potential hazards of building on top of capped chromium that "it's actually safer to build here than virtually anywhere else in the city" ("Harbor Point project stirs environmental concerns,"...

  • Harbor Point: Stick to the facts

    Harbor Point: Stick to the facts

    Dan Rodricks' column ("Following the big money to Harbor Point," Aug. 18) on the development at Harbor Point contributes very little to the ongoing debate about the best ways of developing Baltimore. Indeed, Mr. Rodricks lapses into needless and unhelpful insults when he makes sophomoric reference...

  • No more Harbor Point surprises

    No more Harbor Point surprises

    Our view: News that developer Michael Beatty intends to buy the first round of Harbor Point bonds is a modestly pleasant surprise but a reminder of the lack of transparency in this deal