Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

In a primary, voting counts more than ever [Letter]

There is a primary election going on. If citizens find themselves unhappy over county, state and national issues, now is the time to say so. They should not allow themselves to be browbeaten into believing there is nothing they can do about it.

In fact, because of traditionally low voter turnout, a primary election can actually be the best time to pull off significant change. Don't complain if you are going to put the same politicians back in office regardless of their voting record. Don't complain if you vote solely by party affiliation, a "team," slate or union endorsements.

It's far more important to take the time to learn about the candidates and their positions on the issues than to watch mindless TV or spend endless hours on Facebook. It has never been easier to get such information through the Internet.

If after doing your research you feel very strongly in favor of a particular candidate, you can make the most of your vote. For example, if your favored candidate is running for an office where you have the option to select three candidates, only vote for the one you strongly support.

If you feel an unopposed incumbent hasn't done a good job, don't vote in that category. Perhaps the difference in the number of votes cast versus the number of votes received will make him or her think twice about ignoring constituents in the future. While might not change the outcome of an election it can send a message and maybe make you feel just a tad better as well.

Susan Garber, Laurel

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Polls are not in public interest
    Polls are not in public interest

    Mileah Kromer discusses the reasons that the results of pre-election polls concerning the race for governor were largely incorrect, particularly the timing of the polls on which media and the campaigns relied ("Hogan and Brown: tortoise and hare?" Nov. 12). I do not doubt that she is largely...

  • Purple Maryland
    Purple Maryland

    It's safe to say the election is over, and we are all anxious to see what "color" our state will be. Are we now red with a base of blue or still blue with a splash of red ("Republican sees spending as key for governor-elect," Nov. 14)?

  • Race played no role in Hogan win
    Race played no role in Hogan win

    I read Thomas Schaller's column ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11) regarding Larry Hogan's win over Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown in the 2014 Maryland gubernatorial election. He basically states that the areas Mr. Hogan won had more white people then black.

  • Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it
    Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it

    I agree with letter writer David Byran that Governor-elect Larry Hogan has done Maryland and the entire country a great service ("Good riddance to "O'Malley," Oct. 10).

  • Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?
    Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?

    I couldn't decide whether I was more amused or bemused by Richard J. Cross III's op-ed about the possible Democratic candidates for governor four years from now ("Who will challenge Hogan in 2018?" Nov. 15).

  • Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections
    Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections

    Race, racism, racist. I am so tired of hearing these words whenever a candidate loses or a policy is defeated ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11). Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown lost to Larry Hogan because Mr. Brown ran one of the worst campaigns in recent Maryland elections. He even...