Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Court should rule public prayer constitutional

The U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Town of Greece, New York v. Susan Galloway is to consider whether Christian prayers at town board meetings are constitutional ("Justices to hear prayer case," Nov. 4). The U.S. Court of Appeals based in New York held that such prayers violate the Constitution because they represent "an endorsement of a particular religious viewpoint."

The First Amendment provides that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof[.]" That amendment prohibits the Congress — that is, the federal government — from establishing a national religion as did King Henry VIII who broke with the Catholic Church and established the Church of England in the 16th century. Note that the First Amendment refers to "an," rather than "the," establishment of religion. By its use of "an," the First Amendment prohibits the federal government from passing legislation to establish something not previously recognized in America; that is, a national religion. Moreover, regarding religion, what provision of the Constitution mandates that "the free exercise thereof" is restricted to the confines of a church, synagogue, temple, mosque, etc.? Religious people live their religion on a daily basis; their religion is not something that is limited only to religious observances on Fridays, Saturdays or Sundays at their places of worship.

How is it that the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from regulating religion, has been construed by the federal courts, based on various Supreme Court rulings, to prohibit high school football players from praying prior to a game for the safety of the players, invocations at public school events, a Christmas creche on public property, display of the Ten Commandments in courtrooms, prayers at the beginning of town or county board meetings? None of those activities has anything to do with Congress or establishing a religion. It seems to me that the chief effect of such activities on atheists and non-Christians is annoyance or the sense of being slighted, just as many are annoyed by "In God We Trust" on our currency and "one nation under God" in our Pledge of Allegiance.

However, the Constitution does not guarantee anyone freedom from annoyance or from a sense of being slighted. Those perceptions, real as they may be to some individuals, do not trump the First Amendment. Regarding religion in America, the fact is that Christian churches outnumber all others by approximately 200 to one. Government (federal, state or local) endorsement of the Christian religion, or acknowledgment of a divine being, is not synonymous with "an establishment" of religion.

For those who are irritated by the Christian religion, or religion in general, try "live and let live." You are not being forced to participate in any religion or religious activity. You are merely in a situation where you have to listen to something you do not want to hear. Welcome to the club. You are not being harmed in any real sense. As to the Supreme Court, hopefully, it will overturn the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and render moot those prior rulings on church and state, the reasoning of which have no legitimate connection to the actual wording of the First Amendment.

David R. Holstein, Parkville

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Prayer case reflects intolerance

    Prayer case reflects intolerance

    The recent article about the two woman taking a case to the Supreme Court because they did not like the Christian prayers at town board meetings in Greece, New York perhaps epitomizes the ills of American society ("Supreme Court to hear case on separating church and state," Nov. 2). At a time when...

  • Job stress can cause officers to misbehave

    Job stress can cause officers to misbehave

    This may not be a popular question after the indictment of six officers in connection with the death of Freddie Gray ("Six Baltimore Police officers indicted in death of Freddie Gray," May 22), but is anyone asking about the wellness of the city police as a whole?

  • Preakness and Pimlico are inseparable

    Preakness and Pimlico are inseparable

    Although it may be true that the Pimlico race track needs an update, the Preakness should never leave Baltimore ("Is sun setting on Preakness at Pimlico?" May 17).

  • School money could make a difference

    School money could make a difference

    They're killing Baltimore. No, I am not talking about all the senseless shootings and murders that have occurred since the beginning of the year, nor am I talking about the death of Freddie Gray and the riots that followed.

  • How women entrepreneurs can help rebuild Baltimore

    How women entrepreneurs can help rebuild Baltimore

    As The Sun's Natalie Sherman correctly pointed out ("Selling Baltimore after the rioting," May 16), increasing investment prospects is critical to the growth of Baltimore's business community. Historically, women entrepreneurs have had and will continue to have a significant impact on the local...

  • Parallel parking will soon be a lost art

    Parallel parking will soon be a lost art

    The MVA's decision to drop parallel parking from its driving exam promises nothing good ("Md. driver's test no longer includes parallel parking," May 20).

  • Yes, the rioters were thugs

    Yes, the rioters were thugs

    Writer Lia Purpuna's reflections on the unrest triggered by the death of Freddie Gray while in police custody were sophomoric, inaccurate and selectively incomplete ("Baltimore writers reflect on Freddie Gray's death," May 16).

  • Watch out for drunk drivers this weekend

    Watch out for drunk drivers this weekend

    While The Baltimore Sun is helping to usher in a celebrated time of year otherwise known as summer ("Memorial Day weekend travel projected to be busiest in a decade," May 20), the next three months are also a dangerous time of year when it comes to highway safety.

Comments
Loading

68°