Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Silence, not prayer, before government meetings

The writer of the letter regarding prayers being said at government meetings ("There are much worse things than official prayer," Aug. 14) just plain got it wrong on one main level. The prayer is not the offending issue here, it's where it's being said.

When I'm invited to a place of worship other than one of my own denomination, I enjoy the services and prayers. When I'm invited to some religious rite of passage, other than one pertaining to my religion, again I enjoy witnessing the clergy conduct rituals and prayers. And if I'm in a friend's home and they say prayers before a meal, and they are not prayers that I am accustomed to, I enjoy the customs and traditions displayed by the family and how their prayers are part of this.

But a government meeting is none of the above. A government meeting, by definition, is a meeting where the citizens are being represented and as such their representatives should not feel they are being excluded in any manner or matter. A prayer that relates to a specific religion will inherently do so. It's not a matter of "offending" someone but more a matter of excluding someone.

A moment of silence and reflection before any government meeting where business of the public is about to be decided might be more appropriate. That should be a time whereby the public servants involved think long and hard about the issues before them.

Barbara Blumberg, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Iran deal falls woefully short

    Iran deal falls woefully short

    "Good enough" is not an acceptable alternative when it comes to making a nuclear deal with Iran, a government that consistently urges for "death to America and Israel" ("A 'good enough' deal," July 27). There are far too many questions left in this deal for Congress to accept it at this point in...

  • Iran deal threatens Israel

    Iran deal threatens Israel

    It is sad to see The Baltimore Sun's editorial board acknowledge its support for this awful deal with Iran ("A 'good enough' deal," July 27). War will not be the result if the deal is not signed, but at least the sanctions would still be in place. The only countries benefiting from this deal will...

  • Medicare deserves support

    Medicare deserves support

    Last Wednesday, Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said that we ought to phase out Medicare and that the nation needs to "move to a new system that allows them to have something, because they're not going to have anything." Mr. Bush also praised Rep. Paul Ryan, the architect of a long-term...

  • Eyedrops a flawed substitute for cataract surgery

    Eyedrops a flawed substitute for cataract surgery

    Every medical therapy must weigh both risks and benefits ("Genetics study points towards eyedrop cataract treatment," July 22). While eye drop therapy to treat cataracts sounds enticing, I am not sure its use is worth the potential development costs and risks.

  • Another mass shooting, and who's responsible?

    Another mass shooting, and who's responsible?

    I am a cinema buff, and I went to the Charles Theatre recently to see a wonderful film. While there I realized that another mentally ill person decided to vent his furies in a movie theater. This time in Lafayette, La. ("La. shooter a drifter with 'hate in his heart,'" July 25). This is the USA,...

  • Iran deal opponents seek war

    Iran deal opponents seek war

    The editorial, "A 'good enough' agreement" (July 24), correctly supports the nuclear deal between the West and Iran which will help to bring peace and stability to the Middle East, will bring both economic and political benefits to the U.S., and is supported by 60 percent of the American people....

Comments
Loading

84°