Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

The court didn't go far enough when it declared pit bulls 'inherently dangerous'

Irene and Anthony Solesky are shining examples of what parents should be — caring, loving and concerned. Yet I am sure their young son Dominic, who was brutally mauled by a pit bull five years ago, continues to deal with the traumatic stress of that attack ("Pit bull bill sought for special session," May 8).

Now that the Maryland courts have weighed in against these "dangerous by design" animals, the animal "kooks" have come out of the woodwork, of course. What the court's ruling failed to do, however, was to include other breeds such as Rottweilers, Dobermans and the like in the same category as pit bulls.

Why anyone would own a dog with a vicious nature is beyond me. Maybe it helps enhance their self-esteem. But we already have enough two-legged predators stalking our children. We don't need to add the four-legged kind to the mix.

Mark T. Pfaff, Ocean City

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Another diatribe against pit bulls

    Another diatribe against pit bulls

    As a woman of a certain age and a pit bull adopter, I was dismayed to read another attack on pit bulls by columnist Dan Rodricks that this time seemed to question whether senior citizens are appropriate companions for such dogs ("In Frederick, a tragic reminder of pit bull ruling," Jan. 20).

  • Justice for man's best friend

    Justice for man's best friend

    Judge Richard E. Jordan should be praised for the one-year sentence he handed down in the Alec Taylor animal cruelty case ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12).

  • Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    In response to the editorial "Man's best friend" (Oct. 13), I am disappointed that The Baltimore Sun turned people's reactions to reported abuse into a competition as to which victims of violent crimes are more worthy of sympathy or outrage. Violence is violence, and none of it is good for our...

  • Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Animal cruelty is a violent crime that is often an indicator crime and a predictor crime as well. Animals, however, are property under the law, and while we have seen an increase in the number of prosecutions, most judges continue to treat these crimes as minor property crimes ("Man's best friend,"...

  • People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    Is it too much to ask for The Sun's editorial board to consider both animal abuse and violence against humans as deserving of stiff sentencing ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12)?

  • Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    I want to thank journalist Dan Rodricks for his informative column about pit bulls ("Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack," April 26). It helps me understand more about the pit bull lover uproar and their jargon about it being "the owner, not the breed." However, nothing will...