Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Judge the deed, not the breed [Letter]

I am outraged that the recent commentary attacking pit bulls was ever published ("An unnatural selection," Nov. 15). I am a mother, dog owner and pit bull lover. Kids always need to come first, absolutely, but to say put bulls are inherently dangerous is the same as racial profiling.

I have owned two pit mixes that have never bitten anyone. The one I have now is probably the sweetest dog you will ever meet. He wants to be friends with anyone and anything that crosses our path. He has never been aggressive at all, not even once in his life.

Dogs that are found to have certain issues because of how they were raised shouldn't be placed in a family with kids. When adopting a pet, people should recognize their own family dynamic and choose a dog that fits with that well. Pet owners need to be responsible for their pets of all breeds. A more aggressive dog should not be put out in an alley where kids could come across it.

I absolutely think that owners should be held liable but not because pit bulls are inherently dangerous. But labeling them as such will cause thousands of wonderful animals to be euthanized in shelters just because people think every pit bull is going to attack. This is just false information made on feelings instead of facts.

I understand the writer has emotion tied up in this because his child was injured by a pit bull. That's understandable. That dog was dangerous. But once again, people should judge the deed, not the breed. Just because a person murders someone doesn't mean their whole race is bad, it means that person was bad.

Erin Peneueta

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Justice for man's best friend

    Justice for man's best friend

    Judge Richard E. Jordan should be praised for the one-year sentence he handed down in the Alec Taylor animal cruelty case ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12).

  • Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    In response to the editorial "Man's best friend" (Oct. 13), I am disappointed that The Baltimore Sun turned people's reactions to reported abuse into a competition as to which victims of violent crimes are more worthy of sympathy or outrage. Violence is violence, and none of it is good for our...

  • Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Animal cruelty is a violent crime that is often an indicator crime and a predictor crime as well. Animals, however, are property under the law, and while we have seen an increase in the number of prosecutions, most judges continue to treat these crimes as minor property crimes ("Man's best friend,"...

  • People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    Is it too much to ask for The Sun's editorial board to consider both animal abuse and violence against humans as deserving of stiff sentencing ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12)?

  • Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    I want to thank journalist Dan Rodricks for his informative column about pit bulls ("Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack," April 26). It helps me understand more about the pit bull lover uproar and their jargon about it being "the owner, not the breed." However, nothing will...

  • Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    I was disturbed on multiple levels after reading Dan Rodricks' recent article, "Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack" (April 26). Not only does Mr. Rodricks feed into anti-pit bull hysteria for the sake of sensationalizing a hot-button issue, but his piece can hardly be called...