Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Pit bulls: Focus on the dog, not the breed

CancerWalmart

Over the past 12 years that I have lived in Baltimore, I have grown to respect the caliber of reporting that I find in the Baltimore Sun. Over the past two years, I have seen significant stories researched and presented in impressive ways, even as your reporters, as so many in print media, have faced staffing cuts and lost talented staff to early retirement, you have managed to maintain exceptional quality in reporting.

Until yesterday.

Your choice to publish Dan Rodricks' opinion piece "Pit bulls: Own at your risk" (May 1) was irresponsible. In his piece he cites facts that are blatantly untrue. While I recognize that opinion pieces have a different standard of editorial scrutiny, out and out untruths should not be tolerated.

Study after study has found that there is no breed of dog that is more likely to bite a human than any other. Certainly larger dogs are more likely to cause damage when they do bite. The vast majority of dog attacks are preventable. Not by banning a breed of dog but by encouraging responsible dog ownership, training owners how to recognize warning signs of aggression, teaching people how to interact with the animals in their communities appropriately and most importantly, dealing harshly with those who abuse animals.

My beloved pit mix, Piper, died in January after a battle with cancer. In the last five years she worked with me at my store greeting customers. She licked and welcomed each customer as they came through the door. We used to joke about getting her a vest like a Walmart greeter. She had a sunny disposition and was one of the most predictable, loyal, kind and empathetic creatures I have ever met in my life. She's even mentioned in the Yelp reviews of my business. Our customers cried with me when she died.

Is every pit like her? Of course not. She was a very special dog. Just like any breed, there are pits that are wonderful with people and others that aren't . The point is, knowing the breed of a dog tells one not much about the dog's personality and abilities. A breed can indicate that they are more or less likely to be good at certain things. It can give one an idea of what the animal is likely to look like. But it will tell you very little about their personality or their future aggression (or lack there of). There are Labradors that are vicious, Dobermans that wouldn't hurt a fly and collies that are completely unpredictable. Dogs, like other domestic creatures, show tremendous diversity. The most reliable predictor of an animal's behavior is the environment in which it is raised, socialized and trained.

Labeling a dog because of it's breed is not only inaccurate, it's dangerous. It causes people to make assumptions that are often inaccurate. We need to deal with dog aggression where it really starts: with people. People who are irresponsible, or people who are intentionally cruel. Not with mislabeling an entire breed.

Jacqueline Jones, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
CancerWalmart
  • Justice for man's best friend
    Justice for man's best friend

    Judge Richard E. Jordan should be praised for the one-year sentence he handed down in the Alec Taylor animal cruelty case ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12).

  • Violence against pets must be taken seriously
    Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    In response to the editorial "Man's best friend" (Oct. 13), I am disappointed that The Baltimore Sun turned people's reactions to reported abuse into a competition as to which victims of violent crimes are more worthy of sympathy or outrage. Violence is violence, and none of it is good for...

  • Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]
    Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Animal cruelty is a violent crime that is often an indicator crime and a predictor crime as well. Animals, however, are property under the law, and while we have seen an increase in the number of prosecutions, most judges continue to treat these crimes as minor property crimes ("Man's best...

  • People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]
    People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    Is it too much to ask for The Sun's editorial board to consider both animal abuse and violence against humans as deserving of stiff sentencing ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12)?

  • Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]
    Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    I want to thank journalist Dan Rodricks for his informative column about pit bulls ("Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack," April 26). It helps me understand more about the pit bull lover uproar and their jargon about it being "the owner, not the breed." However, nothing...

  • Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]
    Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    I was disturbed on multiple levels after reading Dan Rodricks' recent article, "Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack" (April 26). Not only does Mr. Rodricks feed into anti-pit bull hysteria for the sake of sensationalizing a hot-button issue, but his piece can hardly be...

  • The deadly menace of pit bulls [Letter]

    I became friends with the Solesky family after I saw first-hand the aftermath of a pit bull attack on my dog ("Singling out pit bulls is unfair," Jan. 6). As a trauma nurse, I saw that the wounds inflicted by pit bulls were kill wounds — perforated carotid, brachial, femoral arteries,...

  • Legislature must protect victims of dog attacks [Letter]
    Legislature must protect victims of dog attacks [Letter]

    Dog bites are tracked by the health department because they are injurious and can cause death. Dog bites and mauling by law are a public welfare concern that has nothing to with dog owners' rights and everything to do with dog owners' responsibilities. When a bite or mauling incident occurs,...

Comments
Loading