Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Legislature should reverse pit bull ruling

Given the lack of interest in the Maryland General Assembly regarding pit bulls being labeled as "inherently dangerous," I must speak out in their defense ("Pit bull bill sought for special session," May 8). Perhaps owners of pit bulls should be labeled as inherently dangerous! My apologies to pit bull owners who love, train, and incorporate their dogs into their families; however, in Baltimore City and County, it is relatively easy to find bad owners creating bad dogs.

I think the legislature needs to correct a mistake. People of Maryland need to speak out and support legislation to undo the Court of Appeals decision. The General Assembly needs to better understand that the dogs are inherently "good," but sadly, this breed attracts the absolute worst owners.

In addition to changing the label, anti-tethering laws are desperately needed in this state. Tethering a dog outside to an inanimate object like a tree for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week is a sure way to "train" an inherently good dog to become a very bad dog. A tethered dog left outside in the elements 24/7 — freezing in the winter and frying in summer due to improper and bare bones shelter — without exercise, affection, and socialization will more than likely become a very frustrated, angry and, eventually, dangerous animal.

Some states with the wisdom to pass anti-tethering laws have recognized that limiting the amount of time that a dog is tethered is a great way to reduce the number of dogs that bite or roam. Some of these states (and even individual communities) have passed laws and ordinances that limit tethering to just a few hours a day. Anti-tethering laws at very least help prevent some of the behaviors of bad owners that make their dogs become mean.

Attention, Gov.Martin O'Malley, state senators and delegates: Create animal abuse laws that are effective in preventing the creation of dangerous dogs. As you for the rest of us, we must speak out in favor of laws that create humane treatment and safer communities!

Nancy B. Marks, Windsor Mill

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Another diatribe against pit bulls

    Another diatribe against pit bulls

    As a woman of a certain age and a pit bull adopter, I was dismayed to read another attack on pit bulls by columnist Dan Rodricks that this time seemed to question whether senior citizens are appropriate companions for such dogs ("In Frederick, a tragic reminder of pit bull ruling," Jan. 20).

  • Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    In response to the editorial "Man's best friend" (Oct. 13), I am disappointed that The Baltimore Sun turned people's reactions to reported abuse into a competition as to which victims of violent crimes are more worthy of sympathy or outrage. Violence is violence, and none of it is good for our...

  • Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Animal cruelty is a violent crime that is often an indicator crime and a predictor crime as well. Animals, however, are property under the law, and while we have seen an increase in the number of prosecutions, most judges continue to treat these crimes as minor property crimes ("Man's best friend,"...

  • People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    Is it too much to ask for The Sun's editorial board to consider both animal abuse and violence against humans as deserving of stiff sentencing ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12)?

  • Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    I want to thank journalist Dan Rodricks for his informative column about pit bulls ("Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack," April 26). It helps me understand more about the pit bull lover uproar and their jargon about it being "the owner, not the breed." However, nothing will...

  • Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    I was disturbed on multiple levels after reading Dan Rodricks' recent article, "Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack" (April 26). Not only does Mr. Rodricks feed into anti-pit bull hysteria for the sake of sensationalizing a hot-button issue, but his piece can hardly be called...