Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Attack on pit bulls is harmful [Letter]

I'm sure you are receiving many emails from pit bull owners who were as shocked as I was to see the horrible commentary by Tony Solesky ("An unnatural selection," Nov. 15). I will make this short and say that while I realize that op-ed pieces by definition are opinion-based, you should have thought of the reasons behind why this man wanted to write this piece and the potential repercussions for your city's animal residents.

The Maryland House of Delegates attempted to reverse the court ruling that pit bulls are inherently dangerous last February, and Mr. Solesky is trying to get a rise out of Baltimore residents because his personal crusade is slowly being ignored in favor of showing kindness to animals within the city. His assertion that pit bulls "were bred to be fighters, both physically and in their instinctual behavior, making them a dangerous choice as a companion pet," along with several other comments, are completely inaccurate.

People like Mr. Solesky and commentary like this are putting family pets in danger when someone who is uneducated reads this, sees a pit bull, assumes its dangerous and kills it citing their "own protection." This sadly is not an exaggeration. This actually has happened multiple times to dogs that have shown no aggression whatsoever. I, personally, would like to see a local rescue group, vet or another actual authority on the matter write a rebuttal soon.

Ashley Byer

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Justice for man's best friend

    Justice for man's best friend

    Judge Richard E. Jordan should be praised for the one-year sentence he handed down in the Alec Taylor animal cruelty case ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12).

  • Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    Violence against pets must be taken seriously

    In response to the editorial "Man's best friend" (Oct. 13), I am disappointed that The Baltimore Sun turned people's reactions to reported abuse into a competition as to which victims of violent crimes are more worthy of sympathy or outrage. Violence is violence, and none of it is good for our...

  • Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Tougher minimum sentences needed for animal cruelty [Letter]

    Animal cruelty is a violent crime that is often an indicator crime and a predictor crime as well. Animals, however, are property under the law, and while we have seen an increase in the number of prosecutions, most judges continue to treat these crimes as minor property crimes ("Man's best friend,"...

  • People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    People who abuse animals are likely to abuse humans, too [Letter]

    Is it too much to ask for The Sun's editorial board to consider both animal abuse and violence against humans as deserving of stiff sentencing ("Man's best friend," Oct. 12)?

  • Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    Pit bulls still dangerous [Letter]

    I want to thank journalist Dan Rodricks for his informative column about pit bulls ("Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack," April 26). It helps me understand more about the pit bull lover uproar and their jargon about it being "the owner, not the breed." However, nothing will...

  • Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    Rodricks feeds into pit bull hysteria [Letter]

    I was disturbed on multiple levels after reading Dan Rodricks' recent article, "Two years after Maryland court ruling, pit bulls on attack" (April 26). Not only does Mr. Rodricks feed into anti-pit bull hysteria for the sake of sensationalizing a hot-button issue, but his piece can hardly be called...