Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Ehrlich sees red

If he would chuck the Soviet-smelling term, "collectivism," and substitute the American terms, "common good," or "general welfare," Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. would have a much better understanding of what is going on in his country ("The vast left-wing conspiracy," Feb. 3).

Paul Marx, Towson

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]
      Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

      It's the political season, which explains another column of "Things That Bug Me." Herewith my latest list for your consideration:

    • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
      Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

    • What Obama should have said
      What Obama should have said

      Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

    • American values under Obama
      American values under Obama

      Two columns ago, I passed on a series of political observations from the heartland. Today, a snapshot of American values and viewpoints a decade and a half into the "new" millennium.

    • Hillary all over again
      Hillary all over again

      With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

    • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
      Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

      The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

    Comments
    Loading