Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Delay of phosphorous rules is a mistake [Letter]

Environmental Pollution

The time to curtail phosphorus in the Chesapeake Bay is now ("Phosphorus rules delayed," Nov. 22). Delaying the new rules limiting the spread of phosphorus-laden poultry manure will only exacerbate a situation that has gone on far too long. Large poultry companies need to be held accountable for the fact that they are the largest single source of pollution in the bay. The 1.5 billion pounds of manure that is produced cannot ecologically be disposed of in such a small area adjacent to the bay without the devastating effects that we are already seeing.

The O'Malley administration's decision to delay new regulations may be politically motived. Governor O'Malley has already shown his true feathers when it comes to the poultry industry in Maryland. His close ties to Perdue and his non-support of the lawsuit by a University of Maryland environmental law clinic are evidence of his artifice. I'm sure with his national political ambitions, he does not want to be seen as an enemy to agriculture. That certainly would not play well at the Iowa caucuses.

While I and my fellow citizens are doing our part via the "flush" tax and the "rain" tax, large poultry companies are getting a free ride. It is time to put legislation in effect that will make them pay their fair share to help clean up the bay. Perhaps if they were forced to pay their fair share, they would be more interested in discovering ways to dispose of chicken manure that did not result in further pollution of our nation's largest estuary.

Wayne R. Carson, Baltimore

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Environmental Pollution
  • Fix the Conowingo before another Hurricane Agnes hits [Letter]
    Fix the Conowingo before another Hurricane Agnes hits [Letter]

    I read with interest commentator Anirban Basu's article touting what a great asset the Conowingo dam is and how it enhances the lives of all Marylanders ("Support the dam to support Md.," Oct. 13).

  • How about aerators to clean up the bay?
    How about aerators to clean up the bay?

    I just read the article about dredging the Susquehanna River, and I couldn't help thinking back to the Seoul Olympics where they used aerators to clean up their filthy water and they got it clean enough that all of the rowing events were held in very safe water ("Study: Dredging little help...

  • Damming the bay's pollution
    Damming the bay's pollution

    Here's the gist of the recent report by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on the Conowingo Dam: Don't confuse a red herring with a red tide. The notion that all the pollution woes of the Chesapeake Bay could be heaped on one 86-year-old hydroelectric facility on the Lower Susquehanna River was...

  • All Maryland's waterways deserve protection
    All Maryland's waterways deserve protection

    The Clean Water Act has brought progress to the Chesapeake Bay, but in order to continue the bay on the path to success we must protect all the waterways in Maryland, including the Anacostia River ("Close Clean Water Act loophole," Nov. 12).

  • Support Clean Water Act
    Support Clean Water Act

    On the 42nd anniversary of the Clean Water Act, a new report from Environment America, "Waterways Restored," highlights the success the law has meant for the Anacostia River, taking it from a state of horrific pollution to giving some hope that it will be safe for swimming and fishing in little...

  • Hogan needs to reverse O'Malley's onerous farm rules
    Hogan needs to reverse O'Malley's onerous farm rules

    In what will be seen as one of soon-to-be ex-Gov. Martin O'Malley's parting shots to the incoming Hogan administration, Mr. O'Malley is pushing through new regulations controlling how farmers fertilize their land ("O'Malley rushes to propose new pollution rules," Nov. 15). Never mind the fact...

  • Dam cleanup too costly
    Dam cleanup too costly

    Regarding the recent commentary about the Conowingo Dam ("Maryland can enforce dam cleanup," Nov. 19), Bob Irvin is correct for the most part. However, let's keep in mind that the Conowingo is a man-made obstruction to sediment, leaves and tree logs that Mother Nature really intended to go to...

  • Denying Conowingo permit won't clean bay
    Denying Conowingo permit won't clean bay

    While I understand the concern about accumulated nutrient buildup in the sediment upstream of the Conowingo Dam posing a hazard to the health of the Chesapeake Bay, as an engineer I do not see what the operation of the dam's power station has anything to do with it ("Maryland can enforce dam...