Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Pesticide use reporting laws haven't worked in other states [Letter]

Unfortunately, your recent support for requiring Maryland's professional applicators to report pesticide use to a state database left readers with the impression that other states have easily implemented such requirements ("Understanding pesticide risk," Feb. 19).

Yet "inoperable" is how a spokesperson for New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently characterized that state's pesticide use reporting system. The spokesman was explaining why the governor had proposed repealing the 1996 law requiring commercial pesticide applicators to submit comprehensive pesticide use reports to the state and making the information available online. New York hasn't issued such a report in almost 10 years.

Nevertheless, New York pest control businesses must still devote time and resources to submitting voluminous amounts of data that no one looks at. Connecticut, Massachusetts and Oregon have had similar experiences administering their respective pesticide use reporting requirements.

The combined experiences of these states amount to millions of wasted dollars without any benefit to the public and the needless burdening of small businesses with useless bureaucratic requirements. That perfectly underscores why Maryland's professional pest management industry opposes the creation of a similar system here.

Gene Harrington, Ellicott City

The writer is vice president of governmental affairs for the National Pest Management Association.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Asthma and pesticides [Letter]

    Asthma and pesticides [Letter]

    Regarding your editorial on the health risks of pesticide use, asthma was once thought to be caused by pesticides, but the link was later disproved ("Understanding pesticide risks," Feb. 20).

  • Understanding pesticide risks [Editorial]

    Understanding pesticide risks [Editorial]

    Our view: Maryland needs to better monitor and document professional pesticide use to judge its impact on public health and the environment

  • Pesticide legislation is needed [Letter]

    Pesticide legislation is needed [Letter]

    As one who has been working on pesticide legislation for a while as a beekeeper and as president of the Central Maryland Beekeepers Association, I'd say you hit the mark in your recent editorial on the subject ("Understanding pesticide risks," Feb. 19).

  • Save bees in order to save ourselves [Letter]

    The commentary, "Bee death mystery could end" (Nov. 21), offers a vital call to sanity in Maryland and world wide. Without data on the poisons being used all around us, we are undermining our shared future.

  • Bee death information withheld [Commentary]

    Bee death information withheld [Commentary]

    A state bill requiring comprehensive reporting of pesticide usage could reveal a cause

  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

Comments
Loading
70°