Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Mossburg column presents a distorted picture of the pension system

Marta Mossburg's recent column on state employee pensions cites the work of Joshua Rauh and Robert Novy-Marx to say how much more Marylanders can expect to pay to "fully fund the system" ("Shifting pension burden means higher taxes," June 5).

To arrive at their specious projections, Messrs. Rauh and Novy-Marx employ a series of assumptions and methods that are both implausible and unrealistic, including projecting future economic growth far below the consensus estimates of recognized economists and assuming future pension fund investment returns of less than half what most investment professionals estimate.

They also limit the state's policy options to raising taxes or cutting spending, ignoring alternatives such as reducing pension benefits, raising employees' pension contributions, or reducing public worker hiring and salary growth — all options that Maryland has employed.

In a 2011 report on state pension plans, Standard & Poor's said that "state governments have a long track record of making adjustments and improving funding ratios." Maryland is no different.

Sun readers deserve fair reporting regarding the cost of funding pension plans — not hyperbole, and not unrealistic projections and unreasonable assumptions used to pursue a particular political agenda.

Keith Brainard, Georgetown, Tex.

The writer is research director of the National Association of State Retirement Administrators.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Md. pension shortfall: It's worse than you think

    R. Dean Kenderdine's attempt ("Pension chief: Mossburg ignores reforms," Dec. 10) to argue the facts in Marta Mossburg's excellent Dec. 5 column, "Maryland's Debt Bomb," is ludicrous on the face of it. Ms. Mossburg cited the State Budget Solutions' national State Debt Study which, using two-year-old...

  • Pension chief: Mossburg ignores reforms

    In her latest column, "Maryland's debt bomb" (Dec. 5), Marta Mossburg cites a report by the State Budget Solutions that Maryland's "pension obligations to state employees are about $48.2 billion." Ms. Mossburg and other critics of defined benefit plans continue to make such erroneous assertions...

  • Pension criticism misses the target

    In his recent op-ed piece ("Maryland's mismanaged pensions," July 10), George Liebmann mischaracterizes numerous aspects of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System that require correction.

  • Maryland's mismanaged pensions

    Maryland's mismanaged pensions

    Questionable investment strategies could put state's bond rating at risk

  • Setting the record straight on Md. state worker pensions

    In her latest column on public pensions, "Shifting pension burden means higher taxes" (June 6) Marta Mossburg conflates a number of issues and misses some important facts. Ignoring last year's pension reform that puts the system on a path for sustainability (80 percent funding by fiscal year 2023...

  • Government workers are not the 1 percent

    Once again, Marta Mossburg displays her disturbing obsession with public employees, as she plays the apologist for the wealthiest Marylanders ("In Maryland, your taxes support many of the one percent," Dec. 7). Ms. Mossburg is again muddying the waters about America's increasing income disparity...

  • Light rail alternative?

    Light rail alternative?

    Maybe it is time to investigate the use of trolley buses again ("Hogan says no to Red Line, yes to Purple," June 25).

  • Hogan should stay on the job if he can

    Hogan should stay on the job if he can

    I've been reading about Gov. Larry Hogan's recent cancer diagnosis and the treatment he will soon require, but while concerns regarding his ability to govern are not entirely unfounded they hardly merit calls for him to step down ("Hogan should resign," June 25).