Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Md. pension shortfall: It's worse than you think

R. Dean Kenderdine's attempt ("Pension chief: Mossburg ignores reforms," Dec. 10) to argue the facts in Marta Mossburg's excellent Dec. 5 column, "Maryland's Debt Bomb," is ludicrous on the face of it. Ms. Mossburg cited the State Budget Solutions' national State Debt Study which, using two-year-old data, actually understated the pension debt.

Extrapolating from the latest full-year data for 2011 from the U.S. Census survey of public pensions, I put Maryland's unfunded pension debt at $78 billion as of this year. Results through the second quarter indicate that number may be optimistic.

From 2007 through 2011, workers "contributed" more than $2.3 billion to pensions, and those running the system blew 98 percent of it. Yet they doled out $869 million in "Other Payments" over that time.

Acknowledged pension obligations increased more than $7 billion and worst of all, while "Active" members paying in dropped about half a percent, the number of beneficiaries increased almost 12 percent. My calculations are based on the pension systems' own assumptions and performance.

When you look at reality the debt must be even worse. Officially Maryland's pension debt is estimated based on investments getting 7.75 percent a year forever. In reality that has been only 4.74 percent over the past 10 years.

The methods used by economists that Mr. Kenderdine attempts to refute are universally accepted because they eliminate the politically influenced assumptions and deceptions that let legislators and governors use pension funds as hidden loans that will not come due until long after they are out of office.

In a recent study, Boston University professor Jack M. Beermann refers to public pension "pathology" and warns that "Retirees face the risk of reduced pension payments and current employees face the risk of receiving less generous retirement benefits than the promises that they have been depending upon."

Other studies this year by economists at the Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank, Harvard Kennedy School Mossavar-Rahmani Center, Notre Dame and Maastricht universities, and The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, confirm that without fundamental reform, public pension funds eventually will run out of money.

Maryland is a classic case of the "moral hazard" cited by pension actuaries victimizing taxpayers and government workers. Gov. Martin O'Malley's dumping of teacher pension debt on local governments this year is hard evidence that politicians know it is hopeless.

None of the "reforms" Mr. Kenderdine touts have had any significant impact on existing pension debt to date, other than possibly in Rhode Island.

Maryland taxpayers and younger government workers are going to be burdened with this debt for decades unless they force real reform now.

Frank Keegan, Baltimore

The writer is editor of State Budget Solutions.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Mossburg column presents a distorted picture of the pension system

      Marta Mossburg's recent column on state employee pensions cites the work of Joshua Rauh and Robert Novy-Marx to say how much more Marylanders can expect to pay to "fully fund the system" ("Shifting pension burden means higher taxes," June 5).

    • Pension chief: Mossburg ignores reforms

      In her latest column, "Maryland's debt bomb" (Dec. 5), Marta Mossburg cites a report by the State Budget Solutions that Maryland's "pension obligations to state employees are about $48.2 billion." Ms. Mossburg and other critics of defined benefit plans continue to make such erroneous assertions...

    • Let Netanyahu speak
      Let Netanyahu speak

      I find it necessary to respond to Frederic B. Hill's odious and erroneous op-ed, "Boehner's unwise move" (Jan. 28).

    • Congress has right to hear Netanyahu
      Congress has right to hear Netanyahu

      In his commentary ("Boehner's unwise move," Jan. 28), Frederic B. Hill claims it was unwise for House Speaker John Boehner to invite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak at a joint session of Congress because it shows deference toward him before an Israeli election.

    • Sick leave can be a lifesaver
      Sick leave can be a lifesaver

      I'm offended by the comments of Del. Kathy Szeliga about whether Maryland should mandate paid sick days ("Lawmakers put paid sick leave on agenda," Jan. 26). I don't need paid sick days to fish. I need paid sick days and job protection because I have cancer and lost my job when I took time...

    • City schools need to re-examine spending
      City schools need to re-examine spending

      Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake recently told legislators that the budget cuts in state education proposed by Gov. Larry Hogan would harm the city and its school system ("Aid cuts hurt city, mayor says," Jan. 28). However, I believe that budget cuts might be just the catalyst needed...

    • Netanyahu speech: Neither unprecedented nor unwise
      Netanyahu speech: Neither unprecedented nor unwise

      Op-ed writer Frederic Hill ("Netanyahu invitation unwise," Jan. 28) faults House Speaker John Boehner for inviting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to Congress two weeks before Israeli elections. "Democratic nations usually do not interfere in another country's vote," Mr. Hill says.

    • Secret Service remains top-notch
      Secret Service remains top-notch

      It is unfortunate that the recent behavior of some Secret Service agents has over-shadowed the agency's reputation for protecting the president and vice president, former presidents, U.S. Supreme Court justices, cabinet members and their families.

    Comments
    Loading