Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Pension criticism misses the target

In his recent op-ed piece ("Maryland's mismanaged pensions," July 10), George Liebmann mischaracterizes numerous aspects of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System that require correction.

He begins his missive with a critique of the system's assumed rate of return — 7.75 percent — stating that earnings for the system have fallen short of that assumption over the last 10 years, a period of time that includes the global recession. Since the pension system takes the long view on investments, a more appropriate metric would be to look at the 25-year average, where the system has earned an average of 8.55 percent as of June 30, 2011, well above the assumed rate of return.

In his piece, Mr. Liebmann makes the blanket assumption that any investments outside of public equity, fixed income and cash should be considered alternative investments, when in fact, a large portion of investments housed in the other asset classes should not be given that moniker. For example, more than half of the assets in the Real Return portfolio are invested in U.S. Treasury Inflation Protection bonds and Global Inflation-Linked bonds — certainly not what anyone would call alternative investments.

He also suggests that the pension fund pays too much in investment management fees. While alternative investment strategies are generally more expensive than traditional ones, the system has benefited, on a net of fee basis, for diversifying into these areas. As of May 31, (the latest date returns are available), the system's private equity portfolio has consistently and significantly outperformed public equities net of all fees over the last 10 years. The real estate portfolio has outperformed both public equities and fixed income on a net of fee basis over the last 10 years. And since its inception date of April 1, 2008, the absolute return portfolio has outperformed public equities by 6.7 percent annualized net of all fees. So, while the system has paid more for these more expensive alternative strategies, these higher costs have been more than offset by both higher returns and risk reduction.

Mr. Liebmann also questions the merit of utilizing a manager to implement a currency hedging program for a portion of the system's non-U.S. public equity program. Given the size and global nature of the public equity portfolio, currency risk is one of the greatest risks facing the system. The primary objective of the currency overlay program is to provide some protection against a strengthening U.S. dollar and reduce the volatility of the currency portion of the system's non-U.S. equity investments over the long-term. Since inception, the currency overlay program has reduced volatility in the international and global equity programs by 14.6 percent and 9.8 percent, respectively, while at the same time realizing positive gains for the system.

R. Dean Kenderdine, Baltimore

The writer is executive director of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Government workers are not the 1 percent

    Once again, Marta Mossburg displays her disturbing obsession with public employees, as she plays the apologist for the wealthiest Marylanders ("In Maryland, your taxes support many of the one percent," Dec. 7). Ms. Mossburg is again muddying the waters about America's increasing income disparity...

  • Mossburg column presents a distorted picture of the pension system

    Marta Mossburg's recent column on state employee pensions cites the work of Joshua Rauh and Robert Novy-Marx to say how much more Marylanders can expect to pay to "fully fund the system" ("Shifting pension burden means higher taxes," June 5).

  • Setting the record straight on Md. state worker pensions

    In her latest column on public pensions, "Shifting pension burden means higher taxes" (June 6) Marta Mossburg conflates a number of issues and misses some important facts. Ignoring last year's pension reform that puts the system on a path for sustainability (80 percent funding by fiscal year 2023...

  • Maryland's mismanaged pensions

    Maryland's mismanaged pensions

    Questionable investment strategies could put state's bond rating at risk

  • Red Line benefits ignored

    Red Line benefits ignored

    Gov. Larry Hogan's decision to cancel the Red Line light rail project after over 10 years of hard work and $288 million in tax dollars spent was a shocker for sure ("Hogan goes off the tracks," June 25). We have to ask exactly what kind of analysis did he do?

  • Treat Lee and Jackson as veterans

    Treat Lee and Jackson as veterans

    Confederate soldiers are legal veterans under U.S. law, and shouldn't this apply to the statue of Confederate veterans Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30)?

  • Baltimore can pay for its own light rail

    Baltimore can pay for its own light rail

    Since most citizens of Maryland, especially those who do not live in Baltimore, would have to supply the $3 billion for the Red Line, I understand why Gov. Larry Hogan has turned it down ("City leaders remain dedicated to fighting for Red Line," July 1).

  • Beware the allure of the evil tempter

    Beware the allure of the evil tempter

    We need our young people to wake up and realize they are being used as pawns in a high-stakes game. They do the selling, the killing, the robbing and stealing while the tempter sits and enjoys his freedom. The tempter spends no time in jail and gets to dictate who lives and who dies. And our youth...