Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Setting the record straight on Md. state worker pensions

In her latest column on public pensions, "Shifting pension burden means higher taxes" (June 6) Marta Mossburg conflates a number of issues and misses some important facts. Ignoring last year's pension reform that puts the system on a path for sustainability (80 percent funding by fiscal year 2023 and 100 percent funding in fiscal year 2030), she instead advances and relies on a study — based neither on historical experience nor a methodology appropriate to a governmental entity — that claims each Maryland household will be on the hook for an extra $818 in taxes every year for the next 30 years to fully fund the system.

It is important to note that the latest actuarial study of the retirement system projects full funding in nearly half that time in part due to the measures included in last year's reform shifting more of the burden onto state employees: increasing employee contributions to their retirement by 40 percent; reducing benefits for service earned after June 30, 2011; increasing vesting for new employees from five to 10 years; and reducing the annual cost of living adjustment for service earned on and after July 1, 2011.

Ms. Mossburg also chooses to focus on short-term rates of return for the pension system's investments. While no one can perfectly forecast the future, the pension system's required rate of return is well within the long-term forecasted range based on its diversified asset allocation. And, importantly, it is well under the 25-year average gross return of 8.55 percent actually experienced by the system.

R. Dean Kenderdine, Baltimore

The writer is director of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Mossburg column presents a distorted picture of the pension system

    Marta Mossburg's recent column on state employee pensions cites the work of Joshua Rauh and Robert Novy-Marx to say how much more Marylanders can expect to pay to "fully fund the system" ("Shifting pension burden means higher taxes," June 5).

  • Cold, hard facts about infrastructure
    Cold, hard facts about infrastructure

    We can now add bursting residential water pipes and thousands of homes without water to ruptured water mains and traffic jams, to chunks of concrete crashing down from slowly collapsing bridges and to the other proof that our infrastructure is falling apart ("Residents' frustration mounts...

  • Hogan is Maryland's Scott Walker
    Hogan is Maryland's Scott Walker

    I am in total agreement with letter writer Jeff Tarleton ("Hogan's game of divide and conquer," Feb. 26) that Gov. Larry Hogan's only purpose in proposing tax breaks on military pensions was an effort to divide a normally cohesive bloc of voters. I will go one further. The whole proposal by...

  • Confronting terrorism requires force
    Confronting terrorism requires force

    Regarding Barbara Risacher's recent letter on the war on terror, the least attractive option is to fail to respond forcibly to terror — a view the writer apparently favors ("New thinking in war on terror," Feb. 26).

  • Fracking's public health hazards
    Fracking's public health hazards

    Recently I heard a West Virginia resident describe how fracking had changed her community. She had many photographs that were even more graphic than her verbal descriptions.

  • Pick up the pace of Md.'s absurdly low speed limits
    Pick up the pace of Md.'s absurdly low speed limits

    I was glad to read that Maryland is considering raising it's absurdly low speed limits ("Maryland Senate votes to raise maximum speed limit to 70 mph," Feb. 19)