Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Payroll tax cut will put a burden on future generations

The so-called Congressional supercommittee was never about finances; it was always about political maneuvering, just as the "payroll tax cut" isn't about fixing the economy but might be more properly be called the "kick-the-can-down-the-road" cut.

First, Social Security taxes are not included in the national budget. So, reducing such revenues will have no effect on current-year deficits.

What the "payroll tax cut" will do is reduce the amount of Social Security revenue that can be borrowed by Congress to spend. That's not necessarily a bad result.

But what the payroll tax cut also does is kick the can down the road, in the sense that future taxpayers will have to make up the revenues that are being lost today with new revenues in the future.

Since Social Security retirement benefit levels are based on workers' earnings, not their contributions, their future benefits won't be reduced even though the current revenues needed to fund them are.

This is another example of near-term political gain paid for with future pain. Burdening future generations with our mismanagement is an egregious failure of our responsibilities.

Warren Updike, Towson

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Unemployment is worse than Obama administration claims

    The Obama administration and the liberal news media continues to keeps up their line that the unemployment rate is between 8 percent 9 percent. Don't believe it, as nothing could be further from the truth. The real unemployment rate ranges close to 15 percent or 16 percent because of the Obama's...

  • Help for the unemployed?

    Help for the unemployed?

    Our view: Renewal of unemployment benefits, largely overlooked in Congress' debate over extending the payroll tax cut, comes with a hefty price