Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

O'Malley: Md.'s commitment to open space remains strong [Letter]

In a recent Sun article calling on me, and Maryland's legislature to reaffirm our longstanding commitment to parks, playgrounds, trails and fields ("Marylanders need to speak up for open space," April 1), Dan Rodricks does a good job of spotlighting an important issue: funding open space preservation. But he misses the forest for the trees, so to speak, on a few key points.

First, he suggests that our commitment to preserving open spaces statewide may be flagging. The facts tell a different story.

Despite the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression, the O'Malley-Brown administration has protected more than 150,000 acres of open space — larger than the total land area of Calvert County — and supported more than 1,300 local recreational projects, all while adopting new, effective policies to advance and improve our overall environmental protection efforts. Since 2009, we've used our GreenPrint evaluation system to score and select potential preservation projects objectively for the first time, based on their ecological value — something no other state does. Since establishing the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays Trust Fund in 2007, my administration has invested over $156 million operational funds and nearly $100 million capital funds in pollution control projects to accelerate our bay restoration efforts.

Additionally, our legislature committed to a first-of-its kind, no-net-loss-of-forest policy last year and recently voted to add over 20,000 acres to our Wildlands System forever guarding some of our most pristine natural areas.

Mr. Rodricks also describes a change in the funding for Program Open Space as "messing with it." The 45-year-old Program Open Space has served our state beautifully in balancing the pressures of development against the vital need for preservation by collecting a small fee on land transfers and using that revenue for environmental protection. Recently, we've used bond sales to ensure that despite the pressures of the economic downturn, we can continue to fully fund Program Open Space uninterrupted. My full commitment to Program Open Space has not changed, and every one of my budget proposals has reflected that.

Finally, Mr. Rodricks is correct to point out that the General Assembly is debating a $100 million cap on the Open Space fund. But their proposal would not end preservation efforts, it would direct revenues in excess of that cap to repair environmental damage caused by development (instead of preserving open spaces as intended). I personally believe the fund should not be capped and should remain in keeping with the sustainable smart-growth goals of the original law — preservation is smarter and cheaper than reactive repairs after the fact.

Maryland has a well-earned reputation as both an innovator and leader in land conservation. That progress has continued throughout the course of this administration, and because of our tough choices, Maryland is better positioned than ever before to preserve our natural treasures and pass them on to our children and grandchildren.

For more information on Maryland's ongoing commitment to preservation and conservation visit: and

Martin O'Malley, Annapolis

The writer, a Democrat, is Maryland governor.

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.

  • The evil of Iran

    The evil of Iran

    We sat 5,000-plus strong in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in the District of Columbia for three intense days of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) 10th summit on July 12-14. We came from all across the nation (including 95 members from other countries and 500 college students). We...

  • Orioles: No gnomes, please

    Orioles: No gnomes, please

    In light of the Orioles recent near-death spiral, many fans have pinned the blame on the Buck Showalter Garden Gnome giveaway ("Buck Showalter garden gnome briefly causes long lines at Camden Yards," June 28). True, their record since the promotion has been dismal and Buck Showalter was warned...

  • Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Like Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's Smarter Baltimore draft report, the commentary, "Broadband for Baltimore" (July 27), has solid recommendations for building high speed Internet in Baltimore. But like that report, it ignores the principal reason that Baltimore City doesn't have broadband. Verizon's...

  • Trump is the anti-politician

    Trump is the anti-politician

    Why are the press and both political parties so upset that Donald Trump is running for president ("The Trump lesson that Bush and Clinton should heed," July 27)? Could it be that he does not need someone else's money so the Democratic National Committee, GOP, George Soros or big business can't...