Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Occupy Wall Street movement usurps the rights of others

Occupy Wall StreetWorld War I (1914-1918)Mergers, Acquisitions and Takeovers

I am a supporter of the constitutional right of all citizens to redress their grievances by virtue of the guarantees for freedom of assembly. However, those rights don't trump the right of other citizens to have free access to their workplace and to not be harassed in their goings and comings. To not have commerce interrupted by demonstrations. Persons have a right to expect to have a clean and threat free area surrounding their business or home. Allowing this type of activity to go on unabated for days and weeks is bowing to threats. It encourages even more blatant and continued disregard for the rights of others.

A demonstration permit should not be granted to allow a tent city in a public park. Historically, the 1932 Bonus March on Washington, D.C. was a similar event. Disgruntled and out of work World War I veterns, and in some cases their families, set up a tent city on the Mall and petitioned the government to give them their promised bonus for their service. After a period of time the military was sent in to clear the Mall.

What the occupy movement is doing is pure and simply a violation of decorum and good judgment, perhaps vagrancy, and a disgrace.

If I were to assemble a mob in support of some cause and then occupy an area in any city that had the same impact on my fellow citizens I would not expect it to be tolerated.

Why camp out? Why occupy? A group can demonstrate daily in good order and very effectively. This form of demonstration, occupation, is intended to provoke confrontation. Their organizers want us to believe that it is spontaneous and just a happening when it is in reality a well choreographed event. It is intended to trigger a violent reaction, and the longer that it goes on the greater the probability for violence erupting on both sides.

It should not be tolerated and it should be stopped by those in authority.

William Engle, Howard County

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Occupy Wall StreetWorld War I (1914-1918)Mergers, Acquisitions and Takeovers
  • Occupy detractors must feel threatened

    Columnist Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. has certainly written quite a flamboyant article regarding the Occupy movement ("Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23). In it, he states a disconnect between them and the so-called "middle class," a catch-all term he uses to project...

  • The importance of Occupy

    The Occupy Wall Street movement was created to make people aware of issues that aren't usually discussed in the mainstream corporate media: the greed of the powerful, the destruction of the environment, violence against women and gays and the perpetual war waged for oil and other...

  • Ehrlich carries 1 percent's water

    In his recent column ("'Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23), Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. illustrates the denial of economic reality in America that is continually propagated by the 1 percent. At the heart of his argument is the idea that the American Dream is alive and...

  • 'Occupy' is gone? We'll see in November

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column about the first anniversary of the Occupy movement betrays a hubris, a willful stupidity, and the usual threadbare deceptions ("Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23). Such are the building blocks of the corrupt edifice that Occupy seeks to...

  • Occupy movement got it right

    Former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column on the Occupy movement summed up the us vs. them Republican party platform (Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23).

  • Conservatives see media bias no matter the facts

    The usual whining from the extreme right about media bias is evident in a recent letter from Stephen Sewell ("Sun lavishes attention on 'Occupy,' ignores tea party," Sept. 24). The writer is long on allegations and short on facts.

  • Sun lavishes attention on bumbling 'Occupy,' ignores effective tea party

    Let me get this straight: a spontaneous movement arises and takes up the name "Tea Party" based on historical actions and the acronym "taxed enough already," amasses a very large number of either followers or sympathizers, and literally reverses the party breakdown in the...

  • Occupy Baltimore: a historical footnote

    It's sad to see a good idea fizzle, and that's what's happened to Occupy Baltimore ("The 1 percent are winning," Sept. 18). But, the movement didn't just "fizzle," it committed suicide.

Comments
Loading