Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

This is not crazy; this is nursing [Letter]

Hospitals and ClinicsInternational Military InterventionsWars and InterventionsKorean War (1950-1953)

The nurses at Emory Hospital who are caring for the two U.S. Ebola patients around the clock are not immune from fear. No nurses are. The truth stares us in the face every time an indiscriminate killer like Ebola or any horrific strain goes viral.

Nurses are so often the first to reach the front lines of an epidemic, the first to recognize and try to relieve patient pain and the first to get to work healing the sick regardless of the challenges and obstacles. Whether it's in Atlanta or Africa, nurses are right now at the bedside dealing with the danger of a disease spread through contact with blood, vomit, saliva and diarrhea. So why on earth would nurses be there?

Because that is nursing: sometimes dirty and dangerous, always physically demanding, and rewarding as hell. We were never promised it would be easy, or safe. They didn't tell us that because nurses don't wait to be told. We are called, we act and we save lives.

Ever since Florence Nightingale, "The Lady With the Lamp," took it upon herself to care for the sick and the wounded in the Crimean War in the 1850s, nurses have proven their value and their valor where care is most daunting and risky. More modern examples include the MASH nurses in the Korean War and those in the HIV epidemic of the United States, before advanced treatments, when AIDS was a death sentence. In the '80s, an accidental needle stick or a drop of tainted blood reaching an open paper cut could have serious repercussions. How about polio? Or cholera? Or smallpox?

Physicians, nurses and other health care professionals make powerful life-saving teams in hospital settings across the globe. Today, nurses are full partners and leaders in the health care process. But the fact is their role in patient care is unmatched. Because of their level of patient engagement, they are the bridge between patients and the health care system, the moral compass for patients' rights and privacy.

Hopefully, one day soon, nurses, physicians and public health researchers will have beaten Ebola. Unfortunately, as history has shown us, new epidemics will emerge, perhaps far more dangerous. Whatever comes, nurses will be there, at the front lines, at the bedside, caring for the sick and the most contagious. We will not do our duty without precautions or fear, but we will do it.

This is not crazy. This is nursing.

Patricia M. Davidson, Baltimore

The writer is dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Nursing.

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Hospitals and ClinicsInternational Military InterventionsWars and InterventionsKorean War (1950-1953)
  • The risk Ebola exposed [Editorial]
    The risk Ebola exposed [Editorial]

    The Centers for Disease Control is urging people not to panic over the pair of nurses who tested positive for Ebola at the hospital in Dallas where an infected man was treated last month. Yet polls show the public isn't buying it — a recent survey found nearly 80 percent of...

  • Could the U.S. have prevented the Ebola outbreak?
    Could the U.S. have prevented the Ebola outbreak?

    In the summer of 1990, some 2,000 U.S. Marines arrived off the coast of Liberia near the capital of Monrovia, which was then being overrun by rebel forces fighting against the government of Samuel Doe. The Marines were in four ships, one of them an amphibious landing craft.

  • To stem the threat from Ebola, close our borders now [Letter]
    To stem the threat from Ebola, close our borders now [Letter]

    As a medical researcher, I have long thought that the approach taken by the federal Centers for Disease Control to protect citizens from infection with Ebola is grossly inadequate ("Unprepared against Ebola?" Oct. 13).

  • Obama not up to Ebola crisis
    Obama not up to Ebola crisis

    In recent days, a number of statements have been issued by President Barack Obama and members of his administration regarding Ebola that are confusing, conflicting and even false and disingenuous. That is not out of the ordinary for this administration. Another crisis, another circular...

  • Rodricks finds the wrong villain in Ebola research debate
    Rodricks finds the wrong villain in Ebola research debate

    Dan Rodricks is, as the saying goes, entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts. In "Vigilance for viruses comes at a cost" (Oct. 19), Mr. Rodricks recites one scientist's complaint (in a Huffington Post interview) that research support from the NIH was on a...

  • How to spend $25m on Ebola
    How to spend $25m on Ebola

    I note that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife have gifted $25 million to fight the Ebola epidemic. I have a great plan for part of the money. Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has failed so far, I think we should give $10 million to Doctors Without Borders. In...

  • In the global village, Ebola is a threat to us all
    In the global village, Ebola is a threat to us all

    Now that it has left Africa, the developed world is finally paying attention to Ebola ("Ebola fears continue to mount, spill into port business, politics," Oct. 16).

  • The Ebola threat [Editorial]
    The Ebola threat [Editorial]

    Our view: President Obama's pledge of stepped-up aid is welcome, but alone it may be too little and too late to prevent the epidemic's spread