Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Nuclear power is not the answer to our energy needs

Dan Ervin's commentary on lifting restrictions on U.S. companies supplying nuclear power equipment abroad is completely misleading ("A nuclear opportunity," May 6).

Nuclear energy is not, as Mr. Ervin says, pollutant free or carbon free. Government regulations allow nuclear power plants to deliberately' and routinely emit hundreds of thousands of curies of radioactive gases and other radioactive elements into the environment every day. Radiation cannot be seen, felt or tasted, so I'm wondering if this is why Mr. Ervin feels he can credibly say that nuclear power is pollution free.

As far as carbon dioxide-free, the energy used to create nuclear energy — to mine the uranium ore, crush, mull and enrich it, then create the concrete and steel container vessel for the reactor and store the hot radioactive nuclear waste — all comes from the consumption of fossil fuels.

When fossil fuels are burned to produce energy, they produce carbon dioxide, and for every ton of carbon burned, 3.7 tons of carbon dioxide gas is released into the atmosphere.

And let's not talk about the highly radioactive waste that will essentially be around forever, even if a place is found to store it. Sooner or later it will end up polluting the environment and harming every living animal and plant on earth. We have produced more than 300,000 tons of dangerous nuclear waste at sites around the world that amount just keeps growing by the day.

Regina Minniss

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • A nuclear opportunity

    A nuclear opportunity

    With the U.S. atomic industry stalled, the government should ease the way for companies to do business abroad

  • Unemployed don't need light rail

    Unemployed don't need light rail

    Richard Webb's letter about the Red Line boondoggle hit the nail on the head ("Red Line was a boondoggle," June 30). Finally, some sensible information about this waste of taxpayers' money.

  • Sioux, Cheyenne not 'peaceful'

    Sioux, Cheyenne not 'peaceful'

    Letter writer Larry Carson took the paper to task for an article that referred to the 1876 event known as "Custer's last stand" as an occasion when Lt. Col. George Custer was "massacred" by the Cheyenne and Sioux tribesmen. Mr. Carson argued that this was a misrepresentation of history because...

  • The house that hate built

    The house that hate built

    My wife and I recently watched the film "Selma," a well done recreation of an important time in our history, the high tide of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s.

  • Light rail fails Orioles fans

    Light rail fails Orioles fans

    I am a resident of Howard County who works in Washington and Baltimore. I take MARC and light rail when possible, even with the attendant problems of scheduling (especially on weekends) and parking.

  • Tyranny of the men (and women) in black

    Tyranny of the men (and women) in black

    Last week we witnessed another ominous crack in our nation's democratic foundation, led by liberal activist Supreme Court justices in black robes. With their recent decisions upholding the Affordable Care Act and legalizing same-sex marriage in all 50 states, the court has again disenfranchised...

  • Loeschke was outstanding

    Loeschke was outstanding

    I have known Maravene Loeschke as a student, faculty member, administrator and college president ("Maravene Loeschke, former Towson U. president, dies," June 27). In each role, she was outstanding — good, committed, enlightened and a dear friend.

  • Hogan turns back on Baltimore transit

    Hogan turns back on Baltimore transit

    Can anybody explain to me how Gov. Larry Hogan could nix the Red Line and yet has meetings scheduled with Delaware to extend the MARC commuter rail into that state ("MARC could be extended to Delaware," June 25)? I guess it's nothing personal against Baltimore, but it sure seems like the needs...

Comments
Loading

64°