Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Nuclear is not the answer

Tom Horton's op-ed in praise of Norman Meadows and nuclear power presented inaccuracies ("Time for greens to embrace nukes," May 22). Climate change is a crisis that necessitates phasing out fossil fuels, but relying on nuclear power to replace them is neither possible nor safe.

Nuclear, like wind, does need backup. Last week 20 of the 104 plants in the U.S. were at zero production including: Calvert Cliffs reactor offline twice this month with malfunctioning steam valves initially; Harris in Raleigh, weakness in vessel head, out since May 15; Palisades, leaking storage tanks, out since May 5th ; San Onofre's two reactors, premature tube wear, out for over a year; Fort Calhoun, safety violation since flooding, out since April, 2011. Kewaunee in Wisconsin was recently shut down for good and will cost an estimated $1 billion to decommission. Votle in Georgia, the one new plant since Three Mile Island disaster, is years away from completion if ever (in nuclear power there is a historic completion rate of 50 percent).

In the United States there are 70,000 metric tons of nuclear waste with no permanent home and meanwhile the taxpayers will end up paying over $22 billion to the utilities for housing this waste. Nuclear power requires enriched uranium for fuel and creates plutonium waste, the ingredients for nuclear weapon proliferation. In Japan, there are 160,000 refugees from Fukushima, and they will probably never be able to return. Fish have been recovered off the harbor that have 7400 times the permissible levels of radiation. Children cannot safely grow in an environment contaminated with radioactive cesium where repeated ingestion of contaminated food, soil and water is a recipe for cancer.

Wind farms can be located so they don't necessitate cutting down forests nor interfere with migratory paths. Wind does not create deadly emissions when accidents occur. According to a 2011 Union of Concerned Scientists report, wind is cheaper than new nuclear. Yes, we need to curb our gargantuan usage. Decreased consumption, increased energy efficiency, wind and solar, with back up from geothermal, hydropower, and biomass will get us to zero coal, zero nuclear, minimal carbon dioxide.

Dr. Gwen L. DuBois

The writer is a member of Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Wind farm addresses climate change threat
    Wind farm addresses climate change threat

    In the past two or three weeks, The Sun has printed at least three letters dealing with the Somerset County wind farm ("Wind project raises serious safety, health concerns," Dec. 6). They differed so much in content that it was almost impossible to see any commonality, except that none addressed...

  • Eastern Shore can offer clean energy
    Eastern Shore can offer clean energy

    Recently, the Maryland Senate Finance Committee heard Sen. Steve Hershey's Kent County Land-Based Wind Generating Stations bill. Nearly 200 people packed the hearing to testify about the expected Mills Branch Wind Energy Project.

  • Maryland is ahead of the curve on solar energy
    Maryland is ahead of the curve on solar energy

    As a lifelong Marylander, I'm proud of the progress that our state has made through successful, bi-partisan initiatives supporting renewable and efficient energy throughout the state. As such, I was concerned when I read a letter published in the Sun on Jan. 26 ("Maryland bucks the trend on solar...

  • Md. needs more clean energy
    Md. needs more clean energy

    Maryland currently ranks fifth in the nation for worst air quality and produces over 60 percent of its energy from dirty sources like coal and natural gas. Immediately after his inauguration, Gov. Larry Hogan rolled back coal regulations that would have greatly improved air quality conditions in...

  • Wind project raises serious safety, health concerns
    Wind project raises serious safety, health concerns

    Andy Bowman's recent commentary regarding his company's wind power project in Somerset County does not represent the view from the eastern side of the Chesapeake Bay ("Politics, not safety concerns, hamper Eastern Shore wind project," Dec. 1).

  • Save money with solar energy
    Save money with solar energy

    Regarding your recent report "Baltimore residents form solar energy co-op" (April 11) there has been an important development for solar energy in Maryland.

  • Wind farm would harm Navy testing
    Wind farm would harm Navy testing

    As a former deputy assistant secretary of defense and past director of the Test Resource Management Center, it is clear to me that the decision to defer a final decision on the Great Bay Wind Energy Project was not a result of the political machinations of Rep. Steny Hoyer or any other political...

  • Mikulski got it right on Somerset wind turbines [Letter]
    Mikulski got it right on Somerset wind turbines [Letter]

    Congratulations to Sen. Barbara Mikulski on her stance regarding the Patuxent River Air Station and the prolonged initiative to place wind turbines in Somerset County ("Eastern Shore wind farm: Let the Navy decide," Aug. 18).

Comments
Loading

54°