Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Do you trust this government to wield virtually unchecked power?

Letter writer David Liddle apparently wishes to persuade us to abandon the Constitution's Fourth Amendment in our quest for an elusive guarantee of security ("Don't worry: The NSA isn't interested in you," June 12).

In doing so, however, he rejects a founding principle of our nation — checks on the power of government over individuals. Moreover, he expresses a naive belief that the overarching powers ceded to government will not be abused.

Edward Snowden, the NSA whistleblower responsible for leaking news of the surveillance program's existence, has said that it does not really work the way the government describes. Even though the content of citizens' communications supposedly are not routinely collected and stored, in fact security contractors like Mr. Snowden can listen to and view such communications at will.

Here are some of the real-world dangers of the NSA contracting with private corporations to collect and analyze data about all our communications:

There are millions of people with security clearance and hundreds of thousands who may have the kind of access to classified information that Mr. Snowden had. Among them there inevitably will be at least some stalkers, angry spouses, political partisans, racists and obsessive-compulsives who abuse their positions.

Moreover, it must be very tempting for corporations with this type of access to spy on their competitors or on government agencies that might award them lucrative contracts.

The very corporate executives who run companies like Booz Allen Hamilton make big campaign contributions, serve at the highest levels of the national security apparatus, then cycle back to make millions in the private sector. They are unlikely to stop the gravy train.

Even if you trust the Obama administration, you have to ask yourself whether you would be willing to trust every future administration with this kind of unchecked power.

Charlie Cooper, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    The government's authority to spy on the private phone calls of millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent expired at midnight Sunday, and for first time since the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, citizens won't have the specter of "Big Brother" looking over their...

  • Taming 'Big Brother'

    Taming 'Big Brother'

    A week after a federal appeals court ruled that the National Security Agency's bulk data collection program was unconstitutional, the Obama administration is urging Congress to approve legislation that would put new limitations on the agency's power to track the private phone calls and emails of...

  • Reining in the surveillance state

    Reining in the surveillance state

    In a sign that the possibility of bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have moved closer to a consensus on modifying the U.S. Patriot Act, which authorizes the government's secret spying program targeting the private phone calls and email...

  • Spying forever

    Spying forever

    Ever since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's revelations last year that the NSA was collecting information on the phone calls and emails of millions of U.S. citizens without their knowledge or consent, lawmakers have been assuring the public they will act to amend the...

  • Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    A recent Baltimore Sun editorial described legislation to reform the government's collection of Americans' phone and email data as a sign that "bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead" ("Reining in the surveillance state," May 5). We'd like to remind The Sun that similar legislation...

  • Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Members criticize the hardworking employees of the National Security Agency, yet they aren't transparent about their oversight role

  • Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Attorney and former CIA officer Matthew Ferraro contends that U.S. intelligence agencies operate within "strict legal controls under the review of lawyers embedded at all levels, inspectors general, courts and Congress" ("The Snowden stigma," June 9).

  • Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Again, we have the "blame the media" scenario ("The Snowden stigma," June 9). A former intelligence officer tries awfully hard to make this point: "Edward Snowden's leaks and their media coverage have unfairly maligned the intelligence industry." But blaming the media for reporting the unprofessional,...