Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Don't worry; the NSA doesn't care about you

Since I have nothing to hide and would like to protect myself and my family from terrorists, I have no problem with the government looking at my e-mails and listening to my phone calls ("NSA data surveillance sparks privacy debate," June 9).

I see no reason for the government to listen or look except to try to find terrorists. What other possible reason could there be? Do they really want to hear me ask my wife to pick up a DVD from the library or some milk from the store on her way home? And are they in the least bit interested when someone's wife calls her lover and says: "Come on over, he just left?" I don't think so.

But there are thousands of nuclear weapons out there in at least a dozen countries, half of which don't watch them as well as we do. And there are thousands of terrorist organizations that would like nothing better than to get one, or several of them, to use on us.

I'm sure that even now there are terrorists figuring out how to steal or buy a nuclear weapon. And when they get it, which I am sure they will, they will not hesitate for one second to set it off in Washington, D.C., New York, London or any one of thousands of other soft targets.

Meanwhile we are helping them with our stupid false horrors about our e-mails and phone call being "listened" to.

When that first nuclear weapon is detonated, probably within 10 years, those who did not want to be listened to — why I don't know, but I guess because they are doing something they shouldn't be doing — will be the first to say: "Why didn't they do anything to stop them?"

Well guess what: that's just what they are trying to do now — stop the terrorists. They have no more interest in listening in on your sordid goings-on than I do.

David Liddle

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    A temporary halt to the NSA's domestic spying program

    The government's authority to spy on the private phone calls of millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent expired at midnight Sunday, and for first time since the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, citizens won't have the specter of "Big Brother" looking over their...

  • Taming 'Big Brother'

    Taming 'Big Brother'

    A week after a federal appeals court ruled that the National Security Agency's bulk data collection program was unconstitutional, the Obama administration is urging Congress to approve legislation that would put new limitations on the agency's power to track the private phone calls and emails of...

  • Reining in the surveillance state

    Reining in the surveillance state

    In a sign that the possibility of bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have moved closer to a consensus on modifying the U.S. Patriot Act, which authorizes the government's secret spying program targeting the private phone calls and email...

  • Spying forever

    Spying forever

    Ever since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's revelations last year that the NSA was collecting information on the phone calls and emails of millions of U.S. citizens without their knowledge or consent, lawmakers have been assuring the public they will act to amend the...

  • Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    Intelligence reform bill is important to safeguarding our security and privacy

    A recent Baltimore Sun editorial described legislation to reform the government's collection of Americans' phone and email data as a sign that "bipartisan cooperation in Congress is not completely dead" ("Reining in the surveillance state," May 5). We'd like to remind The Sun that similar legislation...

  • Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Congress is not transparent enough about its intelligence oversight [Commentary]

    Members criticize the hardworking employees of the National Security Agency, yet they aren't transparent about their oversight role

  • Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Unaccountable intelligence agencies [Letter]

    Attorney and former CIA officer Matthew Ferraro contends that U.S. intelligence agencies operate within "strict legal controls under the review of lawyers embedded at all levels, inspectors general, courts and Congress" ("The Snowden stigma," June 9).

  • Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Intelligence community has only itself to blame [Letter]

    Again, we have the "blame the media" scenario ("The Snowden stigma," June 9). A former intelligence officer tries awfully hard to make this point: "Edward Snowden's leaks and their media coverage have unfairly maligned the intelligence industry." But blaming the media for reporting the unprofessional,...

Comments
Loading
70°