Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Trying to make the calendar regular and mistake-proof robs it of humanity

While reading Joe Burris' article on New Year's Day, I was dumbfounded by the conclusions that were being drawn by the professors at JHU who are proposing a new calendar ("JHU professors propose new calendar," Jan. 1). They claimed that mistakes are made in scheduling with the current calendar but would be eliminated with their calendar, that there should be no objection from the religious community with their proposed changes, and that "everyone" would quickly memorize the calendar.

It all sounds like scientists who want things neat and controlled and who are uncomfortable with the messiness of dealing with "human activity." The reality is that people will always make mistakes when it comes to scheduling, no matter what calendar we use. Please tell me what the difference is between an event that happens the second Tuesday of every month versus happening on, say, the 10th of every month, which is what the new calendar is proposing. If people can't remember the event is on the second Tuesday, why would they remember the 10th?

As a clergy person, I have an objection to Christmas always being on a Sunday. It makes for a very heavy work load every year instead of every 6 years.

Finally, on a personal note, I like having my birthday fall on a weekend. But with the Henke-Henry calendar my birthday will always be on the same day, and if not on the weekend, I will never again have a birthday fall on a weekend day.

The diversity which the Gregorian calendar brings to every year provides spontaneity and fun in looking forward to dates. The H-H calendar would instead be predictable and boring. I think the proposal for the new calendar has more to do with whether you like spontaneity or predictability, and has less to do with being a better way of measuring time.

Rev. Cathy Oatman

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Don't make light of 'suicide watch'
    Don't make light of 'suicide watch'

    First and foremost, let me say that I am a Baltimore Ravens fan win, lose or tie and will be to the day I die. But owner Steve Bisciotti's recent comment, "I am off suicide watch, I am stable mentally," goes beyond the pale ("Despite 'worst year as an owner,' Bisciotti happy with team's...

  • Hogan's game of divide and conquer
    Hogan's game of divide and conquer

    The daily interchange of letters from veterans, retired teachers and others regarding the merits or flaws in Gov. Larry Hogan's proposal to make veteran's pensions tax exempt reveals what I believe the governor really wanted ("Veterans aren't getting undue benefits," Feb. 25).

  • Sun claims to support equal rights for women, yet disses women's basketball
    Sun claims to support equal rights for women, yet disses women's basketball

    I guess you should be congratulated for your editorial, "Now a word about wage gap" (Feb. 24) in which you support equality of wages for women. However, this paper has contributed to the "inequality" of women in sports by ignoring the success of the Maryland Lady Terps and by giving the men's...

  • Fracking's risks extend beyond Western Md.
    Fracking's risks extend beyond Western Md.

    Maryland's legislature passed an impervious surface tax, better known as the rain tax, in 2012. Maryland is the only state that taxes rainwater (pollution run-off), which sounds like they are "stewards of the environment" and have great concern for the streams and rivers flowing into the...

  • Why can't Congress cooperate?
    Why can't Congress cooperate?

    Jules Witcover ("GOP's unchanging game plan: Gang up on Obama," Feb. 24) understands that once a president has been elected, Congress and the Supreme Court are supposed to interact with the White House in a respectable and cooperative manner. This does not mean they have to agree but do have to...

  • Witcover gets his 'one-term' history wrong
    Witcover gets his 'one-term' history wrong

    I read Jules Witcover's column ("GOP's unchanging game plan: Gang up on Obama," Feb. 24) and immediately saw that the date that Sen. Mitch McConnell was purported to have "vowed to make him [President Barack Obama] a one-term president" was inaccurate. This statement was not made in the first...

Comments
Loading