Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Trying to make the calendar regular and mistake-proof robs it of humanity

While reading Joe Burris' article on New Year's Day, I was dumbfounded by the conclusions that were being drawn by the professors at JHU who are proposing a new calendar ("JHU professors propose new calendar," Jan. 1). They claimed that mistakes are made in scheduling with the current calendar but would be eliminated with their calendar, that there should be no objection from the religious community with their proposed changes, and that "everyone" would quickly memorize the calendar.

It all sounds like scientists who want things neat and controlled and who are uncomfortable with the messiness of dealing with "human activity." The reality is that people will always make mistakes when it comes to scheduling, no matter what calendar we use. Please tell me what the difference is between an event that happens the second Tuesday of every month versus happening on, say, the 10th of every month, which is what the new calendar is proposing. If people can't remember the event is on the second Tuesday, why would they remember the 10th?

As a clergy person, I have an objection to Christmas always being on a Sunday. It makes for a very heavy work load every year instead of every 6 years.

Finally, on a personal note, I like having my birthday fall on a weekend. But with the Henke-Henry calendar my birthday will always be on the same day, and if not on the weekend, I will never again have a birthday fall on a weekend day.

The diversity which the Gregorian calendar brings to every year provides spontaneity and fun in looking forward to dates. The H-H calendar would instead be predictable and boring. I think the proposal for the new calendar has more to do with whether you like spontaneity or predictability, and has less to do with being a better way of measuring time.

Rev. Cathy Oatman

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • An alternative track for the Red Line

    An alternative track for the Red Line

    There is another path to developing the Red Line that is much better than what the city and the MTA have been recommending ("City leaders remain dedicated to fighting for Red Line," July 1).

  • Electronic cigarettes merit FDA oversight

    Electronic cigarettes merit FDA oversight

    Youth use of e-cigarettes tripled from 2013 to 2014, and they are now used by kids more than regular cigarettes. But now the House Appropriations Committee — of which Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger is a member — is considering grandfathering in e-cigarettes, little cigars and other products at...

  • Our Soviet-style culture purge

    Our Soviet-style culture purge

    Our country appears to be in the midst of a cultural purge worthy of the old Soviet Union where one could go to the library to look for a bio of a recently-declared "non-person" in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia only to find some cut out pages. Using the deaths of those nine innocent victims in...

  • Officer getting off too lightly

    Officer getting off too lightly

    With regard to police brutality, it's the top officials in Baltimore who have to set policy and do their jobs. The Sun reports Officer Michael McSpadden has been sued five times for alleged brutality or misconduct ("Baltimore officer will not face charges for hitting handcuffed suspect," June 30).

  • Confederate statues are part of our history

    Confederate statues are part of our history

    Politicians never cease to amaze me by their total lack of historical perspective and insight. The controversy over the monuments to Confederate soldiers in Baltimore has to take the prize for pure and utter stupidity ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30).

  • Traitorous Confederates deserve a mention

    Traitorous Confederates deserve a mention

    As an individual who is interested in the history of our country, I cannot help but be perplexed about the debate over Confederate flags and memorials ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30). The point of the matter is that Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, Stonewall...

Comments
Loading

72°