Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Trying to make the calendar regular and mistake-proof robs it of humanity

While reading Joe Burris' article on New Year's Day, I was dumbfounded by the conclusions that were being drawn by the professors at JHU who are proposing a new calendar ("JHU professors propose new calendar," Jan. 1). They claimed that mistakes are made in scheduling with the current calendar but would be eliminated with their calendar, that there should be no objection from the religious community with their proposed changes, and that "everyone" would quickly memorize the calendar.

It all sounds like scientists who want things neat and controlled and who are uncomfortable with the messiness of dealing with "human activity." The reality is that people will always make mistakes when it comes to scheduling, no matter what calendar we use. Please tell me what the difference is between an event that happens the second Tuesday of every month versus happening on, say, the 10th of every month, which is what the new calendar is proposing. If people can't remember the event is on the second Tuesday, why would they remember the 10th?

As a clergy person, I have an objection to Christmas always being on a Sunday. It makes for a very heavy work load every year instead of every 6 years.

Finally, on a personal note, I like having my birthday fall on a weekend. But with the Henke-Henry calendar my birthday will always be on the same day, and if not on the weekend, I will never again have a birthday fall on a weekend day.

The diversity which the Gregorian calendar brings to every year provides spontaneity and fun in looking forward to dates. The H-H calendar would instead be predictable and boring. I think the proposal for the new calendar has more to do with whether you like spontaneity or predictability, and has less to do with being a better way of measuring time.

Rev. Cathy Oatman

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Say no to Pratt Street Plaza
    Say no to Pratt Street Plaza

    The article, "A makeover for Pratt Street plaza" (April 23), proves that the general public has almost no say in what happens in their city. A New York-based company "helped develop the plans" for tearing out the McKeldin Fountain (an oasis of softly falling water and nothing for sale) with the...

  • Don't profile the police
    Don't profile the police

    I watch the news with great concern these days. It is not OK to persecute someone because they wear a hoodie or have low-hanging pants. It is also not OK to persecute someone because they wear a police uniform.

  • Dr. Oz and the triumph of pseudoscience
    Dr. Oz and the triumph of pseudoscience

    I have urged all my patients to avoid the bad dietary supplements that Dr. Oz promotes ("Give Dr. Oz his due," April 21).

  • Police must stop bullying suspects
    Police must stop bullying suspects

    The most recent issues involving Baltimore City Police and the handling of suspects only reinforces the fact that the current system regarding handling of suspects must be scuttled and reconfigured ("Protests intensify over Gray's death," April 22).

  • Going soft on drugs
    Going soft on drugs

    To your editorial, "Schmoke's vindication" (April 17), regarding how former Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke's ideas about drug addiction are now mainstream, dare I add a sparse, "Congratulations?"

  • Unanswered questions surround Gray's death
    Unanswered questions surround Gray's death

    Columnist Dan Rodricks asked some good questions about what happened to Freddie Gray ("Video of Gray arrest begs faster answers to troubling questions," April 20).

Comments
Loading

46°