Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Notre Dame Prep and lesbian weddings [Letter]

I recently read The Sun article, "Notre Dame Prep rejects alumna's same-sex wedding announcement" (Jan. 15), regarding the omission of Sarah Rupert-Sullivan's wedding announcement. I would like to offer my assistance in helping Notre Dame Preparatory School edit its publication policy so it may be aligned with Catholic doctrine.

Although same-sex marriage is a very charged topic, we are fortunate that our Catholic beliefs provide us with a path that can guide us to a course of action that is right and just. The catechism of the Catholic Church unequivocally indicates that marriage is between a man and woman. In 2003, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops cautioned that "popular culture, media and entertainment often undermine or ignore the essential role of marriage and promote equivalence between marriage and homosexual relationships." They also stated that the "Church's teaching about the dignity of homosexual persons is clear. They must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Our respect for them means we condemn all forms of unjust discrimination, harassment or abuse." During a press conference on July 29, 2013, Pope Francis further echoed the importance of treating homosexual individuals justly: "Who am I to judge a gay person of goodwill who seeks the Lord? You can't marginalize these people. … You have to distinguish between the fact of a person being gay, and the fact of a [gay] lobby. The problem isn't having this orientation. The problem is making a lobby."

The Church hierarchy states candidly that same-sex marriages and institutions that rally for these marriages cannot be supported. It is equally clear that individuals who are homosexual must be treated with dignity and not prejudice. The omission of the same-sex marriage announcement and failure to contact Mrs. Rupert-Sullivan could be perceived to be a form of discrimination and marginalization. It is important for Notre Dame to have a well-developed publication policy that respects Church doctrine on marriage and promotes the dignity of all persons which is ultimately the foundation of our Catholic faith.

Again, I would like to volunteer my assistance to help the school edit their publication policy. I would encourage my fellow alumnae to contact Sister Patricia McCarron, the school's headmistress, to offer their support as well.

Andrea Handscomb, Alexandria, Va.

The writer is a 1995 graduate of Notre Dame Preparatory School.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Equality in Alabama
    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a...

  • A speed bump for marriage equality [Editorial]
    A speed bump for marriage equality [Editorial]

    Our view: Decision upholding Louisiana's ban on gay marriage is an outlier but an instructive one as the issue heads to the Supreme Court

  • Jesus didn't condone marriage equality [Letter]
    Jesus didn't condone marriage equality [Letter]

    Madeleine Mysko's recent commentary advised that 645 commissioners of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA will vote later this month whether to accept marriage equality for the LGBTQ community ("Presbyterians to vote on marriage equality," June 6).

  • The triumph of fairness [Editorial]
    The triumph of fairness [Editorial]

    Our view: Failure to put Maryland's transgender rights law on the ballot despite trumped-up fears should be a source of pride

  • Opposing gay rights doesn't make you a hater [Letter]

    According to Tom Schaller's column ("Hate if you must, just don't act on it," March 5), any American who does not subscribe to Mr. Schaller's particular credo on the law and homosexuality is a hater. Such blanket condemnation and name-calling are more appropriate to a bigot than an academic.

  • Despite veto, Arizona still looks bad [Letter]
    Despite veto, Arizona still looks bad [Letter]

    Just when I think nothing else outrageous can be done in the name of religious freedom, along comes the Arizona bill allowing business owners the legal right to refuse service to gays and others on the basis of said freedom.

Comments
Loading