Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Natural gas no panacea [Letter]

People keep talking about how natural gas is cleaner than coal ("Natural gas is bring manufacturing back to the U.S.," March 17). Maybe it burns cleaner, but it's the process we're using to capture the gas that is the problem. The first step in hydraulic fracturing is to poison millions (yes, millions) of gallons of water to pump into the rock. There is no way to clean that poisoned water. The CEOs say there is, but the chemists whose job it is to clean it up are still trying to figure it out. They haven't succeeded. There have been cases where they got the gas out of the rock only to find they didn't have enough room to store it. So, they simply burned it off, wasting this finite resource. Yes, there is a limit to the natural gas on this planet.

There seems to be a race to see how fast we can get the natural gas out and how quickly we can sell it. No one is talking about what happens when it's all gone. What's next? No one is talking about the poisoned water we won't be able to drink or use to grow crops. This is extremely short-sighted. I think of Albert Einstein's observation, "I have faith in two things: gravity and the stupidity of the human race. And I have my doubts about gravity." We have no other planet to go to once we finish poisoning this one. Wake up!

Pat Harcarik, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Fracking not worth the risks
    Fracking not worth the risks

    I applaud The Baltimore Sun for its position in favor of a moratorium on fracking in Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). We are learning more every day of the irreparable damage being done to the environment and health of people living where hydraulic fracturing is taking place....

  • Fracking deserves a pause
    Fracking deserves a pause

    The Maryland House of Delegates gave final approval Tuesday to legislation that would place a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," to produce natural gas in this state for the next three years. The vote was 93-to-45, a two-thirds majority. The proposal offers the kind...

  • Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice
    Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice

    Maryland residents must support the moratorium on fracking and the "gold standard regulations" ("Health, environmental groups seek fracking moratorium," Feb. 5).

  • Why ruin Garrett County?
    Why ruin Garrett County?

    As a retired couple, one of many living in Garrett County, my wife and I find the possibility of fracking wells and all that comes with them completely distressing ("The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits," March 3). Having come from a metropolitan area industrialized to the...

  • Fracking poses problems for Western Md.
    Fracking poses problems for Western Md.

    Last week, a Garrett County resident testified in Annapolis that Maryland should proceed with fracking, the dangerous industrial practice recently banned in New York. He claimed that Western Maryland needs the jobs. I ask, what jobs?

  • The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits
    The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits

    State Sen. Bobby Zirkin's bill putting strict limits on fracking demonstrates the growing concern elected officials have about opening Maryland's doors to the oil and gas industry ("Frosh wades into fracking fight," Feb. 25).

Comments
Loading