Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Balto. Co. murder makes the case for firearms in the home

The article "Woman was killed despite police watch" (Feb. 7) shows why firearms are necessary for individual protection.

A woman and her unborn child were murdered by "a former boyfriend who had been threatening her for years." She was "under police watch and had sought a court order for protection against her alleged killer." "She was in the apartment with at least two children" when she was stabbed to death.

Tragically, neither the police, the correctional system, nor the courts were able to protect this woman. If she had had a firearm and the training to use it, the story might have been headlined "Woman's stalker deterred, arrested," or "Woman protects herself and children with firearm."

The police cannot protect each individual and have no legal requirement to do so. Protective orders are just a piece of paper which can offer no protection from those who choose to break the law. We are each responsible for protecting ourselves and our families, and the best way is to be armed and trained to use those arms.

Carl H. Russell III, Severn

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Why the free ads for Under Armour?
      Why the free ads for Under Armour?

      It is appalling what has happened in Baltimore during the protest. One thing that stood out, at least too me, was on national television and pictures in the newspapers was the marketing power of Under Armour. The company was a financial winner ("Under Armour remains committed to Baltimore despite...

    • Baltimore woes a tale of two cities
      Baltimore woes a tale of two cities

      The conflagrations that were Chicago and Detroit in 1968 after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and Los Angeles in 1991 following the Rodney King case show the potential for what Baltimore might have become. But Baltimore happened for a hugely different reason.

    • Justice for all the victims — not just Freddie Gray
      Justice for all the victims — not just Freddie Gray

      As unfortunate and shameful as the Freddie Gray tragedy was, eight more lives were lost during the protests last week ("Crime unrelated to Freddie Gray protest spikes," May 3).

    • The 'thugs' found an easy mark
      The 'thugs' found an easy mark

      After watching this past week's "protests" in Baltimore play out, I feel new battle lines need to be drawn between the law and the criminals ("A step toward justice for Freddie Gray," May 1). We need an all-out "war on thugs."

    • The next step for Baltimore
      The next step for Baltimore

      As a resident of Baltimore for almost all my life, the events of the past several weeks brought back vivid memories of the turmoil in April 1968 following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. Since that time, we have made great strides in racial relations although there is still work to...

    • Riots sent a message, but was anybody listening?
      Riots sent a message, but was anybody listening?

      I fear that neither Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake nor Gov. Larry Hogan are getting the message behind the protests that have taken place during the last week.

    Comments
    Loading

    75°