Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Morici column oversimplifies President Obama's understanding of the causes of the financial crisis

Peter Morici's piece "Obama's faith in liberalism" (Feb. 21) was written in such a way that the reader could easily have inserted the words liberal or conservative, left or right, etc., in various places in the text and it would still be intelligible.

One example: "Liberal/conservative policies are based more on faith than reason." Later he says that such policies have "little foundation in facts or modern economics." Facts or economics?

Mr. Morici unfairly reduces Obama's understanding of the financial crisis to the idea that it was caused by "lack of regulation" — then goes on for five paragraphs to explain his point of view.

Perhaps President Obama should write a rebuttal that reduces Mr. Morici's understanding of the financial crisis to "too much government regulation" — then write five paragraphs expounding his own views.

Finally, it was not clear whether the closing paragraph was meant to describe conservatives or liberals. "Belief over facts, assertions in place of reason, vilification of opponents: That looks a lot like religion — the worst kind."

Richard Ulrich, Glen Arm

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Banks require regulation

    I am really surprised that someone of Peter Morici's academic standing and obvious financial experience would imply that "banks making loans on real estate assigned inflated values to borrowers who could not repay" and the ensuing financial crisis had nothing to do with "lack of regulation" ("Obama's...

  • Obama's faith-based liberalism

    Obama's faith-based liberalism

    Santorum may have mischaracterized the president's religious views, but he's right that something like theology drives his policy decisions.

  • Morici, like Santorum, offers more heat than light

    Professor Peter Morici would have given a failing grade to a student who submitted a paper with the rambling arguments in his column ("Obama's faith in liberalism," Feb. 21).

  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Orioles: No gnomes, please

    Orioles: No gnomes, please

    In light of the Orioles recent near-death spiral, many fans have pinned the blame on the Buck Showalter Garden Gnome giveaway ("Buck Showalter garden gnome briefly causes long lines at Camden Yards," June 28). True, their record since the promotion has been dismal and Buck Showalter was warned...

  • Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Like Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's Smarter Baltimore draft report, the commentary, "Broadband for Baltimore" (July 27), has solid recommendations for building high speed Internet in Baltimore. But like that report, it ignores the principal reason that Baltimore City doesn't have broadband. Verizon's...

  • The evil of Iran

    The evil of Iran

    We sat 5,000-plus strong in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in the District of Columbia for three intense days of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) 10th summit on July 12-14. We came from all across the nation (including 95 members from other countries and 500 college students). We...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.

Comments
Loading
86°