Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

You haven't heard the last of Heather Mizeur [Letter]

ElectionsHorse RacingConservationGovernmentExecutive BranchBill Clinton

Over the last six months I volunteered with a team of supporters to elect Heather Mizeur as Maryland's next governor.

Heather's campaign was inspiring, honest, respectful, progressive and transparent. She ran on issues that matter to Maryland's people. She brought up things that others wouldn't dare touch in a campaign (for example, death with dignity, disability rights and marijuana legalization). She inspired so many new people to care and rally around the vision we share for Maryland.

There was just one problem: Heather was never given a chance in Maryland's broken electoral process.

Heather ran on public financing and went even further by rejecting corporate cash and state contractor money. Making the decision to return power to Maryland's people, she launched a truly grass-roots campaign — one that couldn't afford yard signs, or t-shirts or lots of paid staffers like the others.

Instead, Heather's campaign relied on volunteers and limited staff pouring their souls into electing her. Not to mention we had two weeks of television ads, compared to months for the corporate-funded candidates. If you saw yard signs or t-shirts, they were made by volunteers who believed in her vision enough to make them on their own.

Early on, most of the Democratic establishment decided to anoint Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown as the winner. They lined up with endorsements and threw resources his way. It was sickening to witness how corrupt and off-base the endorsement process was.

For example, despite the fact that Heather would have been the first openly gay governor in the country and was the strongest candidate on LGBT issues, Equality Maryland endorsed Mr. Brown early on.

Another example: The Maryland League of Conservation Voters decided to endorse Mr. Brown despite the fact that he had a worse environmental record than Heather as a delegate — based on their own score cards. Heather was the only candidate in the race to push for a moratorium on fracking and oppose liquefied natural gas exports from Cove Point.

Mr. Brown even managed to trot Bill Clinton out with an endorsement. I wonder how closely Mr. Clinton was truly paying attention to the options in the Maryland gubernatorial race. I'd bet that he was doing the state's Democrats a favor.

I personally heard from candidates in Maryland who wanted to endorse Heather but were afraid of the wrath of the Democratic Party for doing so. Is that democracy?

And how about the media?! They were worst of all. Even while Heather's popularity was surging, the media treated her like a fringe candidate. We barely received mentions in stories that focused on Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler and Mr. Brown attacking each other.

Why not give more attention to the only candidate who decided to run a campaign without mudslinging?

Despite all this, Heather ended up with 22 percent of the vote. With next to no funding, no yard signs, little name recognition and two weeks of TV ads, we came very close to tying Mr. Gansler for second place.

That's because the people who actually heard Heather's message were excited by it. It was refreshing and different and drove new people to vote.

Perhaps if the Democratic establishment, the media and local organizations decided to endorse candidates based on their principles and their record rather than placing bets like it was a horse race, things would have ended up differently. Mr. Brown might still have won, but at least the election would have been fair and based upon real ideas.

I believe it all starts with getting big, corporate money out of politics. Every Heather supporter should be rallying around this issue. People power is squashed if someone can buy an election. You're simply up against too much with the barrage of TV ads, fliers and signs. I also believe that publicly financed candidates are hampered by the expenditure limit, which is about $2.5 million. This sets a candidate back immediately and forces incredibly tough campaign decisions about resources.

We should also push to allow independents to vote for either party in the primary. I personally know probably 100 individuals who wanted to vote but weren't allowed to because they didn't change their party affiliation or didn't want to. Why shouldn't we give these people a voice too? These are individuals who are bold enough to think outside the two party system, and they should be allowed a vote.

I'm hopeful that Heather Mizeur will run again and that she'll run a clean, honest campaign a second time. In the meantime, I hope that we can tackle the reasons so many amazing candidates are held back. Let's stop allowing corporate media, corporate politicians and corporate contributions to determine our elections.

Perry Wheeler

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
ElectionsHorse RacingConservationGovernmentExecutive BranchBill Clinton
  • Hogan should learn from Connie Morella
    Hogan should learn from Connie Morella

    Tom Schaller's Oct. 20 column, "The Connie Morella effect," was most interesting. I knew Connie Morella well. She was an English professor at Montgomery College when I was teaching Political Science there. We continued our friendship over the years when she was in Congress and...

  • Brown's pre-K promises don't add up
    Brown's pre-K promises don't add up

    Throughout the last two months, the Anthony Brown campaign has accused Larry Hogan of being "extreme" and "dangerous" in regard to his views on two volatile issues — a woman's right to choose and the regulation of assault weapons. Time and again, in a variety of...

  • What did Hogan tell the NRA?
    What did Hogan tell the NRA?

    Based on what Republican gubernatorial candidate Larry Hogan has said about gun control, it's hard to see what the National Rifle Association would find appealing about him. He has said that although he opposed the strict new gun control legislation Gov. Martin O'Malley championed two...

  • Moms want answers from Hogan on guns
    Moms want answers from Hogan on guns

    Despite gubernatorial candidate Larry Hogan's public flip-flopping on guns and the Maryland Firearms Safety Act — he must have some of a stance on guns. He completed a questionnaire for National Rifle Association that earned him an "A-" rating from the Washington gun...

  • Brown shows guts by debating Hogan
    Brown shows guts by debating Hogan

    I like Anthony Brown's obvious guts.

  • Ulman-Rutherford (or vice versa) the best ticket
    Ulman-Rutherford (or vice versa) the best ticket

    Count me among the people who are dispirited by the governor's race. Thus, The Sun's suggestion that a ticket featuring the candidates for lieutenant governor, Democrat Ken Ulman and Republican Boyd Rutherford (or vice-versa), would present a far better ticket than pairing Mr. Ulman...

  • That's the ticket [Editorial]
    That's the ticket [Editorial]

    Anyone who is completely dispirited by Maryland's governor's race (and by this point, who isn't?) was in for a pleasant surprise today with the campaign's sole debate between the nominees for lieutenant governor, Republican Boyd Rutherford and Democrat Ken Ulman. The...

  • Brown ads are appalling
    Brown ads are appalling

    The latest attack ads from Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's campaign and the Democratic Party hit a new low in sleaze, lies and hypocrisy ("Heading into final weeks, Brown shifts tone," Oct. 15). With oozing self-righteousness, they show youngsters and speak of how their opponent is...

Comments
Loading