Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Miracles often require science and tax dollars

It's wonderful that in our age of instant communication, digital reality and unmanned aerial warfare, there are still those who believe in miracles. And yes, miracles are very real, though infrequent. I'm one who's also hoping for the complete recovery of Teresa Bartlinski ("Call for a miracle," Nov. 29).

However, it is important to credit the "miracle" of modern science that has made this adopted girl's survival possible. I also consider it a "miracle" that the Bartlinski family can pay for all the medical care and upcoming operation out of pocket and were able to go into enormous debt doing so. It's refreshing and humbling the Bartilinski's have not relied on any help from the government or taxpayer funded programs. God bless them.

Unfortunately, the rest of us are not as fortunate, and when tragedy strikes or sickness occurs, a safety net is also a miracle. During the recent presidential campaign, much was said on the Republican side about faith-based assistance, which they considered preferable to Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs.

In rare cases like that of the deeply religious Bartlinski family, government safety nets can be avoided, but it would be wrong to make this the only option. Also, what will happen to the debt the family has already accrued? Will they eventually declare bankruptcy to wipe out their obligations?

It would be wonderful, indeed, if communities and religious organizations could fund the needs of the sick, impoverished and disabled, but that miracle isn't about to happen. Nevertheless, it was fascinating to read how one family is able to take on such a burden. They deserve so much credit — but not if they decide to declare bankruptcy to eliminate their indebtedness. This story has two sides, one the belief in miracles and the other a hard appraisal of reality.

Rosalind Heid, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Electronic cigarettes merit FDA oversight

    Electronic cigarettes merit FDA oversight

    Youth use of e-cigarettes tripled from 2013 to 2014, and they are now used by kids more than regular cigarettes. But now the House Appropriations Committee — of which Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger is a member — is considering grandfathering in e-cigarettes, little cigars and other products at...

  • Our Soviet-style culture purge

    Our Soviet-style culture purge

    Our country appears to be in the midst of a cultural purge worthy of the old Soviet Union where one could go to the library to look for a bio of a recently-declared "non-person" in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia only to find some cut out pages. Using the deaths of those nine innocent victims in...

  • Officer getting off too lightly

    Officer getting off too lightly

    With regard to police brutality, it's the top officials in Baltimore who have to set policy and do their jobs. The Sun reports Officer Michael McSpadden has been sued five times for alleged brutality or misconduct ("Baltimore officer will not face charges for hitting handcuffed suspect," June 30).

  • Confederate statues are part of our history

    Confederate statues are part of our history

    Politicians never cease to amaze me by their total lack of historical perspective and insight. The controversy over the monuments to Confederate soldiers in Baltimore has to take the prize for pure and utter stupidity ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30).

  • Traitorous Confederates deserve a mention

    Traitorous Confederates deserve a mention

    As an individual who is interested in the history of our country, I cannot help but be perplexed about the debate over Confederate flags and memorials ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30). The point of the matter is that Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, Stonewall...

  • Did hospitals really save $100 million?

    Did hospitals really save $100 million?

    Maybe the $100 million in so-called savings by hospitals in Maryland does not tell the entire story ("Better care for less," July 1).

Comments
Loading

68°