Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Don't equate crime with mental illness

I am grateful to Mark Komrad for his expert commentary related to persuading a troubled loved one or friend into professional mental health treatment and The Sun for publishing it ("Helping them to get help," Dec. 19). I would like to emphasize a point Dr. Komrad made twice: Mental illness should not be equated with crime.

Mistakenly, some of the public identify mass killers, as in Newtown, Conn., with all people with any mental illness. Consequently, the social stigma of mental illness is an added burden people with these illnesses must bear. Mental illness is a treatable illness, not a crime or a lack of moral strength. As a person with successfully treated clinical depression, I can speak to this subject with some personal authority.

I meet with a support group of folks with clinical depression or bipolar disorder. When a tragedy like the Newtown shooting occurs, we grieve as does the rest of our country. Our response personally to such major stresses is regular treatment with our mental health professionals — psychiatrists and psychotherapists, supplemented with attendance at our support group and the social support of family and friends. In this way, we care for our illnesses, just as most of you with hypertension, diabetes or cancer would do.

Mental health services are difficult to access even for people with insurance or financial means. Some medications are extremely expensive. Without financial advantages, treatment is woefully inadequate at best. But that's another sad story.

V. Hoagland, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

    • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
      Md. gun law is working [Letter]

      Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

    • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
      Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

      Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

    • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

      Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

    • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
      The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

      While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

    • Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]
      Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

      U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

    Comments
    Loading