Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Involuntary commitment for mental health patients is a scam [Letter]

Regarding John J. Boronow and Steven S. Sharfstein recent commentary, comparing every unwilling patient to the alleged 18-year-old who thinks she can fly is ridiculous ("Close the mental health revolving door, Dec. 29).

Moreover, "anasognosia," or re-branded "denial" with a fancy name, is a pretty convenient way to ensure a steady supply of customers.

How is it that people can languish in hospitals for years and never be helped, let alone cured? This is why the door was finally pried open. The "medications" forced upon people are nothing more than useless moneymakers with hideous side affects.

Has anyone ever seen someone drooling with their head wrenched to one side under the caring application of thorazine? Many other drugs with less extreme side affects are just as useless.

It shouldn't even be necessary to bring up the unbelievably weak protections against involuntary commitment. A small room at the facility, with an administrative judge, a clueless public defender who just met the client and no rules of evidence or anything resembling a real court invites miscarriages of justice.

As someone whose college career was disrupted several times by nothing more than the testimony of my addled mother, I can attest that getting away from the revolving door and the "care" is the only thing that allowed me to finish my education, find a career and have a family.

Let's not forget that in the past it was such "doctors" who brought us lobotomies, electric shock therapy as a treatment for depression and so-called "hospitals" where somehow no one ever gets better and goes home.

Virgil Moore, Catonsville

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Through the mental health revolving door [Letter]

    As a parent of a child suffering for 14 years from a devastating severe mental illness — one that includes zero awareness and utter denial that the illness exists — I am bewildered why Maryland has failed to create an assisted outpatient treatment (community based) program ("Close...

  • Untreated mental illness hurts everyone [Letter]

    Thanks to Steven S. Sharfstein and John J. Boronow for their insightful article on treating mental illness and for helping to educate those fortunate enough not to know about such matters ("Closing the mental health revolving door," Dec. 29).

  • Managing mental illness [Letter]

    Regarding John J. Boronow and Steven S. Sharfstein's recent commentary on mental illness, I said the same thing, albeit more bluntly and without a clinical diagnosis, in a 2007 unpublished letter to the editor ("Close the mental health revolving door," Dec. 29).

  • Close the mental health revolving door [Commentary]
    Close the mental health revolving door [Commentary]

    A state law allowing doctors to keep patients under court-ordered treatment after release into the community would save lives

  • Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?
    Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

    I have always acted in an environmentally sound way in how I treat rainwater. I have never owned a house where rain water left my property. Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters ("Miller storm-water fee bill advances in Senate," March 19)?

  • Md. ignores teen cancer risk
    Md. ignores teen cancer risk

    By rejecting state Sen. Jamie Raskin's bill to make tanning-salon ultraviolet ray machines off-limits to minors, the Senate's Finance Committee has put itself at odds with every major national and state medical group to look at the issue, including the American Academy of Dermatology, the...

Comments
Loading