Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

How much research on marijuana does The Sun want?

This letter is in response to The Sun's editorial on medical marijuana ("Go slow," Jan. 3). Recently, a medical marijuana panel commissioned by the Maryland legislature recommended two divergent proposals. One recommends dispensaries allow doctors to recommend marijuana to patients, and the other allows research institutions to test the efficacy of marijuana on human test subjects. The Sun supports the latter view. I find the support of this viewpoint to be quite frankly absurd.

Marijuana has been one of the most researched drugs in the 20th century. Civilizations have been using the substance for thousands of years. You say we need more research? The FDA routinely approves pharmaceutical drugs that they know to be harmful. How many times have we heard of an FDA approved medication killing its users? Too many times to count.

Yet The Sun believes we need more research on a drug that has zero recorded deaths. Maybe more research on ailment specific usage, but even with FDA approved medications doctors still have to experiment with the unique variables for their specific patient. Medicine is still an evolving science; no amount of research will find all the problems or intricacies of a medication.

Marijuana has proven safe enough to be prescribed by doctors without the bureaucratic apparatus of research institution led viewpoint advocated by Health Secretary Dr. Joshua Sharfstein. How long until we allow patients to use marijuana medicinally without being forced to procure their medicine on the black market? How long until we allow patients to bypass the complex and suffocating legal system to get their medicine? According to Dr. Sharfstein and The Sun, investigating the "effectiveness, side effects, indications, appropriate dose and so on" would take years if not decades to satisfy their need for "more research."

Research institutions are not large enough or equipped enough to deal with the large amount of patients who require and use medical marijuana. Not to mention that 72 percent of Marylanders support the idea of patients having easy, legal access marijuana. Most likely this would be achieved through dispensaries rather than research institutions due to the fact that marijuana has already been proven to effectively help these ailments and patients (something that inevitably comes down to the doctor/patient relationship regardless of research).

Therefore, Sen. David Brinkley's proposal of allowing doctors to prescribe this already well researched medicine to their patients through dispensaries is vastly superior to the antiquated viewpoint repeated for decades of "more research" advocated by Dr. Sharfstein and The Sun.

Christopher Snyder, Abingdon

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland should legalize pot [Letter]
    Maryland should legalize pot [Letter]

    I think it should be a person's own choice to do whatever drug a person chooses as long as it doesn't involve committing a crime to acquire the drug. When it comes to marijuana, we should be able to have and smoke as much as we like ("Fixing Md.'s marijuana law," Oct. 3).

  • Medical marijuana could help decrease overdoses
    Medical marijuana could help decrease overdoses

    In the article "Overdose patients repeatedly end up in hospital" (Dec. 30), The Sun highlighted a number of strategies to deal with epidemic problem of narcotic abuse. Not mentioned, however, is an article from the August 2014 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Significantly it...

  • D.C. pot law is none of Harris' business
    D.C. pot law is none of Harris' business

    I am sick of Republican politicians who follow their own agenda rather than the will of the people who elected them.

  • Blame pot, not almonds, for Calif. water woes
    Blame pot, not almonds, for Calif. water woes

    The Baltimore Sun editorial staff members have a certain left-leaning character that can be relied on at all times, never failing to stake their turf well. The Saturday editorial "Almond killjoy" (April 11) might be considered to be an exception to this rule, in their light-hearted attempt to bemoan...

  • Pot users treated as non-persons
    Pot users treated as non-persons

    Maryland legislators should take in account U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment in their consideration of what to do with the marijuana laws ("Maryland lawmakers take fresh run at legalizing marijuana," Jan. 31). No state shall deprive a person of their life, liberty and property without due process...

  • End America's failed war on marijuana
    End America's failed war on marijuana

    Regarding Daniel Takash's thoughtful commentary on marijuana laws, marijuana prohibition is indefensible ("Marijuana legalization is the only option," Oct. 27).

  • Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]
    Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]

    Our view: Already critics are poking holes in the state's pot decriminalization law are becoming clear; lawmakers should fix the obvious problems but otherwise wait to see how it works in practice

  • Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]
    Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]

    McKenzie Elliott, the 3-year-old shot to death in Baltimore, is a recent victim of misguided drug laws ("Politicians, churchmen talk policing in Northwest Baltimore," Sept. 9). While I do not support open use of "illegal drugs," I do not find that drug sales or use represent a criminal act. Drug...

Comments
Loading

61°