Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Physicians need periodic checkups in medical marijuana use [Letter]

A recent article raised a number of questions about medical marijuana in Maryland and the risk its use poses to public trust in the medical community ("Medical pot rules raise concern," July 26).

As health care providers for this city's children, adolescents and young adults, we witness the harmful effects of chronic marijuana use on health and development in our practice every day. We are thus skeptical of Del. Dan K. Morhaim's assertion that the requirement for continuing medical education for physicians prescribing medical marijuana in Maryland is too burdensome.

This requirement is not a burden but rather a way to ensure that practicing doctors keep up to date on medical evidence. All Maryland physicians are required to complete 50 continuing medical education credits each time they renew their license. The problems Delegate Morhaim cites with designing CME for medical marijuana highlight that it is not actually a standard treatment for any medical condition.

If marijuana were like any other medication available to the most vulnerable patients (for example, cancer and AIDS patients) evidence-based CME programs for doctors would be the norm. The fact that proponents of medical marijuana say that the bar should be lowered for this drug suggests what we have long suspected: That medical marijuana legislation is an attempt to use doctors to legitimize and normalize drug use as a step toward legalization.

Hoover Adger, Maria Trent, Krishna Upadhya, Baltimore

The writers are on the faculty of the Department of Pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland should legalize pot [Letter]
    Maryland should legalize pot [Letter]

    I think it should be a person's own choice to do whatever drug a person chooses as long as it doesn't involve committing a crime to acquire the drug. When it comes to marijuana, we should be able to have and smoke as much as we like ("Fixing Md.'s marijuana law," Oct. 3).

  • Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]
    Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]

    Our view: Already critics are poking holes in the state's pot decriminalization law are becoming clear; lawmakers should fix the obvious problems but otherwise wait to see how it works in practice

  • Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]
    Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]

    McKenzie Elliott, the 3-year-old shot to death in Baltimore, is a recent victim of misguided drug laws ("Politicians, churchmen talk policing in Northwest Baltimore," Sept. 9). While I do not support open use of "illegal drugs," I do not find that drug sales or use represent a criminal act....

  • Medical marijuana rules a work in progress [Letter]
    Medical marijuana rules a work in progress [Letter]

    As members of the Natalie M. LaPrade Medical Marijuana Commission's policy subcommittee, we are honored to be able to serve our fellow citizens to develop a program that makes medical marijuana available to those Marylanders who have not found relief from conventional treatments and may benefit...

  • Medical marijuana regulations would scare off physicians [Letter]
    Medical marijuana regulations would scare off physicians [Letter]

    Faculty at the prestigious Johns Hopkins School of Medicine conclude, in a letter responding to the July 25 article "Medical marijuana rules for doctors raise concerns" that requirements on physicians recommending marijuana for medical use are "not a burden" ("Physicians need periodic...

  • Maryland's medical marijuana paradox [Editorial]
    Maryland's medical marijuana paradox [Editorial]

    Our view: Advocates' concerns about proposed state medical marijuana regulations reflect the lunacy of federal treatment of the drug