Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Md. should repeal sodomy laws

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller is right that Maryland isn't "the Southern state that [it] used to be" and has become more progressive ("Session ends in a flurry of votes," April 9). Yet, for all the progress that has been made, there remains one blemish on Maryland's progressive record that legislators should act to remove as soon as they reconvene: Maryland's sodomy laws.

Maryland is one of only 18 states in the nation with sodomy laws still on the books. Of those states, half are in the South (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia).

On paper, Maryland's sodomy laws criminalize all forms of non-vaginal sex, including consensual sex between opposite-sex couples and consensual sex between same-sex couples. In reality, the state has not prosecuted consensual, noncommercial, private sexual activity, whether same-sex or opposite-sex, since the late 1990s. Still, the state has kept its archaic sodomy laws on the books, allegedly so it could use them to prosecute cases of sexual assault, prostitution, or sex in public, even though those acts are already prohibited under other state criminal laws.

Never mind that sodomy laws were effectively invalidated by the United States Supreme Court 10 years ago or that Virginia's law — which is remarkably similar to Maryland's in its breadth — was struck down by a federal appeals court just last month as being "flatly contrary to controlling Supreme Court precedent" and "facially unconstitutional."

Perhaps the most compelling reason to strike Maryland's sodomy laws from the books is that it would drive another nail in the coffin of gay, lesbian, and bisexual stigmatization in the state. As one legal commentator bluntly put it, "unenforced sodomy laws are the chief systematic way that society as a whole tells gays they are scum." Imagine the impact on the self-esteem of Maryland's lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth when they discover that, at least on paper, their state considers them to be criminals.

Sharon Grosfeld, who was a legislator in the Maryland General Assembly from 1994 to 2006, was right, too, when she argued in the late 1990s that Maryland should repeal its sodomy laws. "Our statutes and our law books are a way for people to know their rights and responsibilities," she said. "If it's not repealed, many people will think it's still good law."

Now is the time for Maryland to jettison its archaic and unconstitutional sodomy laws, once and for all. Let's give Marylanders one more reason to be proud of the Free State's progressivism and commitment to fairness, dignity and equality for all.

Marc Salans, Chevy Chase

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination
      Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

      A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government...

    • Equality in Alabama
      Equality in Alabama

      These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a...

    • A speed bump for marriage equality [Editorial]
      A speed bump for marriage equality [Editorial]

      Our view: Decision upholding Louisiana's ban on gay marriage is an outlier but an instructive one as the issue heads to the Supreme Court

    • Jesus didn't condone marriage equality [Letter]
      Jesus didn't condone marriage equality [Letter]

      Madeleine Mysko's recent commentary advised that 645 commissioners of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA will vote later this month whether to accept marriage equality for the LGBTQ community ("Presbyterians to vote on marriage equality," June 6).

    • The triumph of fairness [Editorial]
      The triumph of fairness [Editorial]

      Our view: Failure to put Maryland's transgender rights law on the ballot despite trumped-up fears should be a source of pride

    • Opposing gay rights doesn't make you a hater [Letter]

      According to Tom Schaller's column ("Hate if you must, just don't act on it," March 5), any American who does not subscribe to Mr. Schaller's particular credo on the law and homosexuality is a hater. Such blanket condemnation and name-calling are more appropriate to a bigot than an academic.

    Comments
    Loading