Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Don't sell off Baltimore's heritage, flaunt it instead

Baltimore is one of the oldest cities in the United States, with a wealth of history and historical landmarks. It's amazing how the City Council thinks it owns those historic landmarks ("Ownership isn't the issue," April 4). How presumptuous of them to sell or lease the city's heritage to fill its coffers. A new low has been achieved in this city's politics with this idea.

They seem to forget the people own the landmarks, not the City Council, not MayorStephanie Rawlings-Blake, Not the governor but the people. There are other ways to raise funds. The city's tourism department should encompass all of the historical landmarks. They need to get off of their duffs, do some work for a change and come up with some ideas to attract tourists to Baltimore.

For example, they might get volunteers to dress in period costumes at each landmark around the city telling what happened at each location. Get some character actors out there, perhaps a high school student who could earn community service points or college students, especially history majors, who could earn internship credit. There are a lot of seniors who would be delighted to be in costume, too, and who probably have a wealth of information. We have trolleys and free buses which can be used — included in the price of tours — to ferry tourists and local residents who want to learn about Baltimore's rich history.

Sell the War Memorial and forget those who gave their lives so the slackers of the city can collect their paycheck for doing nothing?

Sell the Civil War Museum which was once part of the Presidents Street Station from which the 6th Massachusetts Regiment, heading to Camden Yards, drew the first blood of the Civil War, as well as the Edgar Allen Poe House and his grave? The City does not need these either? While they are at it, why not sell the Inner Harbor, The Shot Tower, theU.S.S. Constellation, the Basilica and the Lloyd Street Synagogue? We do not need any of these landmarks. They are only a part of Baltimore's history. Sell the whole city. That should bring in a nice fat sum of money.

We have a rich and long heritage which should be flaunted to bring people into the city to learn about Baltimore's contribution to the founding and preservation of our country rather than selling it off because the politicians are greedy, stupid, and lazy.

Charles, Pikesville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Landmarks for sale

    Landmarks for sale

    Our view: The city could benefit from selling some public properties, but it needs to do so carefully and in conjunction with private preservationists

  • Plan to sell Baltimore landmarks is a good start

    It's a start. Baltimore City's decision to consider selling or otherwise turning over 15 city-owned historic landmarks to new ownership or management is a step in the right direction. But is it well thought out and does it go far enough?

  • Preserving our past: Ownership isn't the issue

    Preserving our past: Ownership isn't the issue

    Proposal to sell city-owned historic properties should prompt a renewed effort to inventory and protect Baltimore's heritage

  • Volunteers have poured money and effort into landmarks Baltimore now wants to sell

    I totally agree with the "Readers Respond" letter from Roz Ellis Heid, responding to the city's idea of possibly selling, leasing, or maintaining 15 historic City landmarks ("City eyeing sale of 15 sites," March 21). As Ms. Heid, Baltimore Heritage Executive Director Johns Hopkins and The Sun article...

  • Take President's Station off the 'for sale' list

    As a member of Friends of President Station and a neighborhood resident who has worked tirelessly with many others to create the Baltimore Civil War Museum, I'm incredulous this historic building is now on the "neglected" list ("City eyeing sale of 15 sites," March 21). It's a unique museum/education...

  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Orioles: No gnomes, please

    Orioles: No gnomes, please

    In light of the Orioles recent near-death spiral, many fans have pinned the blame on the Buck Showalter Garden Gnome giveaway ("Buck Showalter garden gnome briefly causes long lines at Camden Yards," June 28). True, their record since the promotion has been dismal and Buck Showalter was warned...

  • Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Like Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's Smarter Baltimore draft report, the commentary, "Broadband for Baltimore" (July 27), has solid recommendations for building high speed Internet in Baltimore. But like that report, it ignores the principal reason that Baltimore City doesn't have broadband. Verizon's...

Comments
Loading
81°