Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Komen foundation shouldn't give any money to Planned Parenthood

It is encouraging to see the number of people willing to help women with breast cancer. However, the Susan G. Komen foundation should not give money to Planned Parenthood ("Komen reverses funding stance," Feb. 4).

A quick search on Google shows many medical studies reporting that women who have an abortion increase their risk for breast cancer. Despite the large amount of money raised for the Susan G. Komen foundation, they have done nothing to educate the public on these findings.

According to your paper, last year the Susan G. Komen foundation gave $650,000 to 16 Planned Parenthood clinics for breast-health services. It is irresponsible to give money raised to find a cure for breast cancer to the largest abortion provider in our nation.

Perhaps the most disturbing part of the business relationship between the Susan G. Komen Foundation and Planned Parenthood is the fact that Planned Parenthood does not even provide mammograms at its clinics.

Whenever I see the pink ribbon, I see the purity of white tainted with red blood. Is this yet another case where hard-core feminists will do anything to preserve legalized abortion? Do they really care about women or is it just a money making scheme which plays on the heartstrings of America?

Laura Jones, Annapolis

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Must there be a feminist frenzy at Super Bowl time every year?

    I'm beginning to wonder if there is a connection between the Super Bowl and heightened feminist frenzy. Last year, it was the Tebows' commercial celebrating life and the gift of children that had feminists all in a lather. This year it revolves around the Susan B. Komen Foundation's decision (and...

  • Komen deserves its comeuppance

    My sister died of breast cancer. Nevertheless, I find the pink ribbon mania of the Susan G. Komen organization repugnant. Trying to put a "happy face" on a devastating disease is grotesque.

  • Komen's attack on abortion rights

    Our view: Susan G. Komen for the Cure puts women's health at risk by denying breast cancer screening funds to Planned Parenthood on questionable grounds

  • Komen was right to strip Planned Parenthood of funding

    I am delighted to read that the Komen Foundation has withdrawn its funding from Planned Parenthood ("Komen's attack on abortion rights," Feb. 2).

  • Komen wrong to support Planned Parenthood

    I have to scratch my head why the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundationwas funding Planned Parenthood in the first place ("Komen's attack on abortion rights," Feb. 2). With some research suggesting an increased rate of breast cancer among those who have abortions , it seems that funding Planned...

  • No dancing on Red Line's grave

    No dancing on Red Line's grave

    Spare us the dancing on the grave of the Red Line by those who have no right to call it a boondoggle ("Red Line was a boondoggle," June 30). We'll never know if it was or not since it won't be built in my lifetime. Certainly, I can't foresee any of Baltimore's myriad social problems improving without...

  • Ban smokeless tobacco from baseball

    Ban smokeless tobacco from baseball

    It is time for Major League Baseball to take a stand and ban smokeless tobacco, period. It is a foul, disgusting and dangerous addiction. It's never talked about until you hear of a player or former player who is diagnosed with mouth cancer or a player such as Tony Gwynn dies from the disease (...

  • EPA mercury ruling was even-handed

    EPA mercury ruling was even-handed

    The Sun's article on mercury limits incorrectly asserts that the U.S. Supreme Court split on ideological grounds ("Justices rule against EPA power plant mercury limits," June 29). On the contrary, the Supreme Court split was one between original intent, honest interpretations of the Constitution...

Comments
Loading

77°