Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Rodricks has a double-standard on partisan loyalty

I was disappointed and, quite frankly, surprised to read Dan Rodricks' column in which he wrote that based upon his opposition to the tax increase, Senator Bobby Zirkin should switch political parties and become a Republican ("Bobby Zirkin: secret Republican?" March 20).

As a guest on Mr. Rodricks' radio program last year, I discussed my decision to support marriage equality and the fact that I was the only Republican senator to do so; support, I might add, that Mr. Rodricks applauded.

I find it surprising that Mr. Rodricks chose not to suggest that based upon my support of marriage equality that I should switch political parties and become a Democrat.

Since my decision to support marriage equality, there have been some who have indeed suggested I should leave the Republican Party and become a Democrat. Such an idea is ridiculous. I am a strong Republican who firmly believes in the Republican principles of personal and economic freedom.

Knowing him well, I can assure you that Senator Zirkin is a strong Democrat. He and I often disagree about issues that come before the state Senate. However, despite our political differences, I greatly respect Senator Zirkin for his willingness to look at the merits of each issue and do what he feels is best for his constituents and the citizens of Maryland regardless of the political consequences.

Allan H. Kittleman, Annapolis

The writer, a Republican, represents Howard County in the state Senate.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland needs more politicians like Del. Bobby Zirkin

    Thanks to political anomalies like Sen. Bobby Zirkin who put their constituents above party politics, there is at least a glimmer of hope that Maryland citizens may not have to pay higher taxes this year to balance the state's budget ("Bobby Zirkin: secret Republican?" March 21).

  • Zirkin: Why isn't Rodricks disgusted?

    Dan Rodricks turned his editorial fire on me for standing up against income tax increases passed by the state Senate that would hit nearly all Marylanders in this sluggish economy ("Maybe Bobby Zirkin should be a Republican," March 20). Mr. Rodricks seems to believe that any Democrat who dares...

  • On taxes, Zirkin is in a tough spot

    On Tuesday, Dan Rodricks cast Bobby Zirkin as a "secret Republican" for voting against a tax increase aimed at wealthy taxpayers. On the next day, the senator defended his position by noting "our citizens are suffering through a serious economic downturn" ("Zirkin: Why isn't Dan Rodricks disgusted?"...

  • Get rid of bad cops
    Get rid of bad cops

    It's a sickening, recurring pattern in Baltimore: A citizen is arrested and while transporting the so-called suspect to the police precinct for booking, he gets the stuffing beat out of him. To further rub salt in the wound, the cops are ultimately exonerated from any wrongdoing ("Investigation...

  • Ignorance on immigration
    Ignorance on immigration

    Republicans have written to your newspaper claiming that President Barack Obama, former Gov. Martin O'Malley and other Democratic elected officials are trying to "give voting rights to millions of undocumented immigrants who came here illegally and don't belong in this country in the first place"...

  • Aid agencies sow seeds of hope
    Aid agencies sow seeds of hope

    I read the your report "Fierce clashes in Iraq as Islamic State seizes villages near Ramadi" (April 15) with a mixture of sadness, fear and exasperation.

  • MRIs for pets aren't so novel
    MRIs for pets aren't so novel

    I read your recent article about magnetic resonance imaging of pets at Johns Hopkins with great interest ("Johns Hopkins begins using high-tech equipment on pets," April 7).

  • How can Hillary Clinton be a champion of the middle class when she's part of the 1 percent?
    How can Hillary Clinton be a champion of the middle class when she's part of the 1 percent?

    Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton says there is something wrong when CEOs make 300 times more than the typical worker. I can't help but wonder why she doesn't feel there isn't something wrong with making $300,000 for one speech.