Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Drone strikes are good, but the death penalty is bad?

Marylanders should thank The Sun for showing the faces of those convicted murderers and describing their killings ("Death row: Should they die for their crimes?" Feb. 10). They are only alive today because Gov. Martin O'Malley has not acted to give them the penalty mandated by their trial and the law, giving them additional life with his countless delays. These people are alive today only because the same justice system that death penalty opponents point to as unfairly sentencing them is the same justice system treating their victims and victims' families so unfairly by keeping them alive.

But I also don't think it's fair and unbiased to present the changed view of one opposing the death sentence when that person is a sister of one of the five murderers. Responding to her view, I think that the murderer should think of the impact on his family first before killing the members of another family.

The penalty for murder should not be a roof over your head, free health care and three square meals a day to ensure there is no "cruel and unusual punishment." There will be no repeat offenders if these sentences are carried out for the five individuals. Can death penalty opponents claim that for their preference of life without parole for murderers who will then be a threat with nothing to lose to those entrusted to watch over them? Why aren't their arguments concerning the failure of the justice system and racial disparity of sentencing applicable to the sentence of life without parole?

President Barack Obama can order, without trial, the death of a citizen residing in another country who threatens us, but we can't follow through with the same sentence in this country after a trial for one who has actually killed a U.S. citizen?

Charles Herr, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Time to re-think U.S. use of drones

    Time to re-think U.S. use of drones

    Drones over Syria? Hold on! ("CIA eyes drone strikes in Syria," March 16). The whole business of drone strikes on nations with whom we are not at war gets murkier and more distasteful daily — and cries out for transparency from the Obama administration on drone practice and policy, especially abroad.

  • Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Our view: A filibuster produces some clarity — though not enough — about the Obama administration's policies on domestic drone strikes

  • Obama made U.S. weaker, more vulnerable

    I must live in a different country than Sen. Jim Rosapepe ("U.S. stronger, safer under President Obama," Oct. 27). Unfortunately, my country has a terrible economy with 23 million people out of work. In four years, the price of gasoline has doubled, the average family has seen a yearly income loss...

  • Middle East mess was born in the U.S.A.

    Middle East mess was born in the U.S.A.

    American meddling in the Arab world has produced decades of disasters, so why are we still there?

  • The real problem with David Petraeus

    There are a lot worse things going on in our country right now than Gen. David Petraeus cheating on his wife, and one of them is our country's invidious use of drone warfare. The worst part about it is that we have been brainwashed to believe that it is an acceptable plan of action. The only television...

  • The law of drones

    The law of drones

    Our view: Despite Congress' efforts get more information about U.S. drone strikes abroad, details of the program remain as elusive as ever

  • Petraeus thought he was above the law

    Gen. David Petraeus' actions over the past several years show that he considers himself more of a prince than a member of the armed forces who answers to his civilian commander-in-chief ("Did Petraeus have to step down?" Nov. 13).

  • Drone strikes stir hatred of the U.S.

    "No more drones" is the right policy, as writer Agnes Merrick said in a recent op-ed ("The real Petraeus problem," Dec. 8). Bravo to The Sun for printing it.