Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

The real reason Obama hasn't approved Keystone [Letter]

There are so many falsehoods and inaccuracies in your editorial that I cannot rebut them point by point ("The Keystone delay," April 22). I would rather present the facts about why the Keystone pipeline should have been approved years ago and why President Barack Obama's continued delays are both wrong-headed and duplicitous.

Due to domestic U.S. fracking and the tar sands oil that would be transported via the Keystone pipeline, the U.S. and Canada have now discovered that we have about 100 years of gas and oil reserves to access and deploy. Developing these resources will help both America's and the world's economies. Energy companies will continue to develop non-carbon energy sources — wind, solar and nuclear — not due to inherent altruism but rather because they are capitalistic, for-profit entities and know carbon energy sources are a finite resource.

Canada has handed us a way out of $3.75 per gallon gas prices and Middle Eastern dominated oil sourcing on a platter. President Obama is electing to reject this offer not due to any visceral concerns about environmental pollution — innumerable objective analyses (most recently by the U.S. State Department) have negated that ill-founded fear — but rather to a bare-knuckled acknowledgment that wealthy Democratic National Committee, far left green donors are blackmailing the president into submission, regardless of growing bipartisan support for the Keystone pipeline's development. Specifically, Wall Street hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer has dangled a $100 million donation to the DNC, if President Obama elects not to develop Keystone.

Keystone will create hundreds of thousands of jobs, provide a jolt to our moribund economy and enhance our foreign policy initiatives when the U.S. becomes a viable gas and oil alternative to Russia for our NATO and former Baltic States allies. Anyone who does not perceive this reality is either blindly anti-energy and anti-capitalistic or suicidally naïve.

Thomas M. Neale, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • If Keystone would help the economy, what about upgrading our infrastructure?
    If Keystone would help the economy, what about upgrading our infrastructure?

    Whether you are for or against the Keystone XL pipeline, The Sun's recent article revealed what $1 dollar spent on infrastructure can return to the economy ("Nebraska Court OKs route for Keystone pipeline," Jan. 10).

  • Keystone offers little benefit to U.S.
    Keystone offers little benefit to U.S.

    The permitting and construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline has become a controversial political issue, and its passage is the top priority of the Republican leadership in the Congress ("The Republican agenda," Jan. 5).

  • Keystone XL is an outdated technology for meeting tomorrow's needs
    Keystone XL is an outdated technology for meeting tomorrow's needs

    It makes no sense to invest billions of dollars in a dead-end technology like the Keystone XL pipeline, which will be obsolete and of ever-declining value over the next dozen years as we burn up yet more of our dwindling fossil fuel reserves ("Keystone comes up dry," Nov. 19).

  • Keystone will end U.S. reliance on Mideast oil
    Keystone will end U.S. reliance on Mideast oil

    Regarding Paul Romney's recent letter to the editor about the Keystone XL pipeline, Keystone is being built to connect crude oil producers in Canada and the Bakken region directly with refineries in the Gulf Coast ("Keystone veto was in U.S. interest," March 1).

  • Our government is broken [Letter]
    Our government is broken [Letter]

    Canada has a shale oil supply that could have reduced U.S. reliance of oil imports from the Middle East, provided thousands of American jobs and ultimately lowered the price of gasoline for American citizens. But President Barack Obama has held the project hostage. Not the House of...

  • Keystone comes up dry
    Keystone comes up dry

    Tuesday evening's Senate vote to approve the Keystone XL pipeline may have come up one vote shy of the necessary 60-vote margin, but it's surely not the last we've heard of the project. Republicans have become so enamored of TransCanada's vision of a 1,200-mile link from Canadian tar sands...

Comments
Loading