Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Ehrlich wrong on Jewish views [Letter]

As the beloved Ronald Reagan might say, "there he goes again."

Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s hypocrisy ("Liberals, too, get foot-in-mouth disease," Feb. 2) is absolutely mind-boggling.

He excoriates "the staggering intolerance … practiced by the country's culturally progressive elite" in decrying those who are "pro-life." Yet Mr. Ehrlich, as both a congressional and gubernatorial candidate, ran as an abortion-rights supporter.

He claims to be aghast that anyone might believe that "that any Jew who really understands the issues" should not support his candidacy. Yet, as evidenced by recent columns, he vehemently opposes the Affordable Care Act while claiming to be a friend of Israel.

Jewish religious law regards health care as a right, not a privilege. Further, according to research conducted by former Baltimorean Rabbi Alan Yuter (a Republican, by the way), it even prefers a single-payer system. Which is what the citizens of the State of Israel today enjoy. And it works quite well.

So how could it possibly be that what is good enough for the Holy Land is not good enough for the United States of America?

Finally, there is Mr. Ehrlich's tacit acceptance of analogies between the Nazis' war against the Jews and criticism of the ultra-rich.

According to the Talmud, "God's seal is truth." Mr. Ehrlich should keep that in mind the next time he chooses to pontificate about domestic and international Jewish communal matters and voting preferences.

Saul Edelman, Reisterstown

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan
    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
    Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

    The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

  • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
    Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

    OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

  • Hillary all over again
    Hillary all over again

    With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

  • What Obama should have said
    What Obama should have said

    Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

  • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
    Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

  • Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong
    Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong

    I'm often perplexed by the content in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column and wonder if he is free from fact-checking because his words appear on the op-ed page. One particular paragraph in his column, "American values under Obama" (Nov. 2), left me even more confused than usual.

Comments
Loading