Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Op-ed takes a too rosy view of Iranian intentions

Commentator Ray McGovern charges Israel with using the pretext of alleged Iranian support for terrorism, to "whip up support for war" ("Is Israel fixing the intel? Netanyahu's rhetoric has echoes of Bush administration's justification for the Iraq war," July 31).

The day before Mr. McGovern's commentary appeared, The Times of India reported that police in Delhi had concluded that "the suspects involved in the February 13 bomb attack on an Israeli diplomat in India's capital were members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of the nation's military." The group's leader also was said to have planned the strikes against Israelis in Georgia and Thailand.

Mr. McGovern doubts Iranian or Hezbollah involvement in the recent terrorist murders of Israelis in Bulgaria. But a suspect in the thwarted plan for a similar attack in Cyprus reportedly has confessed to working with the Iranian-backed Hezbollah.

He also claims that "since there is no mutual defense treaty between the U.S. and Israel, 'ally' actually is a misnomer — at least in the juridical sense." Yet a retired CIA analyst like Mr. McGovern ought to know that the United States long ago designated Israel as a major non-NATO ally.

Mr. McGovern, a founder of "Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity," has blamed "O.I.L." — oil, Israel, and logistics (the alleged desire for long-term U.S. bases in Iraq) — for the 2003 war with Saddam Hussein. But Iraq's cat-and-mouse games with international inspectors, conversion of the U.N.'s "oil-for-food" revenue and other actions helped convince former Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Sen. Edward Kennedy, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and others across the political spectrum that Hussein was trying to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction.

Mr. McGovern signed a petition claiming the U.S. government knew about al-Qaeda's Sept. 11, 2001, plot in advance. He participated in the futile 2011 attempt to break Israel's sea blockade of the Gaza Strip, which was put in place to prevent weapons smuggling by Hamas terrorists.

In 2010, Mr. McGovern was outside the White House barking through a bullhorn, telling President Obama "to stand up for once … and speak to [Israeli Prime MinisterBenjamin] Netanyahu in no uncertain terms."

The U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency has warned that weapons may well be the goal of Iran's illicit nuclear program. The United States believes Iran tried to blow up the Saudi ambassador inside a busy Washington restaurant. But Ray McGovern is fixed on delusions of Israeli skulduggery.

Eric Rozenman, Washington

The writer is Washington director of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Under normal circumstances, Congress should not get involved in preliminary treaty negotiations, since it has the option of refusing to pass the document by not mustering a two-thirds vote of approval.

  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Unfortunately, the skilled Iranian negotiators have already won the game against a concession-minded P5-1 array of nations headed by the United States ("Iran's dangerous game," June 5). With funds now flowing into Iran and even more lucrative trade agreements being discussed with that nation, Iran...

  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as their new deadline. Iran says there will be no extension if a deal...

  • Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Regarding Ray McGovern's commentary "Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?" (July 20), much as we'd like to believe this is a good deal for the U.S., the facts suggest otherwise.

  • Iran's dangerous game

    Iran's dangerous game

    With less than a month to go before negotiators for the U.S and its partners are supposed to reach a deal limiting Iran's nuclear program, the talks appear to have stalled over Tehran's resistance to allowing inspectors to visit Iranian military bases and other sites to verify compliance with any...

  • Russia and China won't enforce Iran's deal with the U.S.

    Russia and China won't enforce Iran's deal with the U.S.

    Does letter writer Joseph Szot actually believe that Russia and China, Iran's potentially two largest trading partners, won't overlook any violation of its commitments — including halting nuclear weapons development — in order to continue unfettered trade with that country ("Iran likely to keep...

  • The Mideast's new reality

    The Mideast's new reality

    The multiple wars roiling the Middle East have rarely made for stranger bedfellows than the U.S. and Iran, which unexpectedly now find themselves backing opposite sides in some conflicts while simultaneously working hand-in-hand against mutual foes in others. Not surprisingly, neither country is...

Comments
Loading
88°