Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Uncritical supporters of Israel are apologists for war crimes [Letter]


Commentators Jason Blavatt and Ellen Ginsberg Simon point out that "Hamas is striking out to gain the world's attention" in order to "hurt Israel's image by depicting her as a bloodthirsty violator of international norms" ("Hamas' unjust war," July 31).

But they cite this as if it were merely a virtual reality rather than actual heinous acts being perpetrated against real innocent people. Their description of the killing of citizens as an "image" problem highlights a number of obvious truths:

Number one, if Israel is really concerned about its image, it needs to immediately cease the indiscriminate slaughter of civilians.

Number two, if Israel continues to demonstrate a total disregard for both human "collateral damage" as well for international law, it should expect its image will not only be tarnished, but there will likely be a spike in anti-Semitism.

For the writers to refer to Israel's murderous rampage as a "depiction" by Hamas — as if Israel is an innocent victim — is either disingenuous or short-sighted.

From my point of view I see the writers' opinions as a smoke screen to ward off world opinion from condemning the Israeli military as war criminals, as it should. Hamas is certainly not without culpability, but its actions are not a license for Israel to murder anyone who gets in the way of its lust for revenge.

Steve Weaver, Baltimore

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Israel has acted responsibly against Hamas [Letter]
    Israel has acted responsibly against Hamas [Letter]

    The recent letter writer critical of Israeli actions in Gaza ("Israel committed war crimes during its invasion of Gaza," Oct. 1) conveniently forgets the origins of the Gaza conflict and the effort that Israel made to reduce civilian casualties. Hamas for the last eight years has been...

  • Hopkins is hypocritical on academic freedom
    Hopkins is hypocritical on academic freedom

    On Sept. 26, an interdisciplinary cohort of students, faculty and staff at Johns Hopkins University answered President Ronald Daniel's call to join the conversation on academic freedom, which he wrote, "deserves dialogue and debate" ("Hopkins welcomes debate on academic...