Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

ISIS claim of a caliphate is an insult to Islam [Letter]

The terrorist organization ISIS, which has established a so-called Caliphate in Iraq, is a insult to the true teachings of Islam ("Taliban debate merits of Islamic State's caliphate announcement," July 11). Along with all other extremists, they pretend to represent and spread those teachings when all they do is spread hate and violence, which go against Islam in every way. Caliphate, as expressed in the Quran, is a spiritual institution, not a political one, and it seeks to establish peace and security, not fear and hate. Thus, ISIS will fail, as their goals are selfish and political.

A true Caliphate has already existed for the past 106 years leading the Amadiyah Muslim Community, an international movement present in over 200 countries, in a campaign to spread peace and justice for all. The present Caliph, His Holiness Mirza Masroor Ahmad, has spoken at the European Parliament, British House of Commons, German Military Headquarters and Capitol Hill. Each time, he has condemned terrorism and violence and advocated for peace and justice. There is no better example of a true Caliph today than him.

Mohammad Iqbal Khan, Aberdeen

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Iraqis give away U.S. weapons

    Iraqis give away U.S. weapons

    Observing the Iraqi forces fighting ISIS running away every time they engage ISIS is one thing, but it is entirely another thing for the Iraqis to abandon their American weapons every time they retreat in a panic ("Islamic State seizes part of ancient town of Palmyra in Syria," May 20).

  • Obama's costly foreign policy failures

    Obama's costly foreign policy failures

    Peter Morici produced a fine piece of writing and logic ("The poverty of Obama's foreign policy," May 20). But he should give some credit to President Barack Obama's self-proclaimed "successes" in Iraq, Yemen and Libya.

  • In Iraq, a de facto U.S.-Iran alliance

    In Iraq, a de facto U.S.-Iran alliance

    In principle, the Obama administration's strategy for confronting the Islamic State made perfect sense: The U.S. would conduct military airstrikes against insurgent strongholds in Syria and Iraq in support of coordinated attacks on the ground by troops fielded by our regional allies. The goal was...

  • Obama takes radical Islam too lightly

    Obama takes radical Islam too lightly

    I give The Sun's editorial board credit for using the correct term — "radical Islam" ("Radical Islam in Africa," April 13) to describe the terrorist attack in Kenya. But you really can't expect the Obama administration to do one thing since President Barack Obama described al-Qaida as "one the...

  • Only Muslims can defeat radical Islam

    Only Muslims can defeat radical Islam

    Commentator Huma Munir offered an excellent portrayal of the Qur'anic vision that has been corrupted to justify a violent political reality ("Real Muslims don't terrorize," April 7).

  • Mideast Christians risk persecution and death for their faith

    Mideast Christians risk persecution and death for their faith

    One of the terrible by-products of the rise of Islamic radicalism is the destruction of Christian communities of the Middle East ("Islamic State seizes Christians," Feb. 25).

  • Obama ended the Iraq war, which was what voters elected him to do

    Obama ended the Iraq war, which was what voters elected him to do

    In response to reader Jay Hilgartner's letter, Bud Adams asserts that the "disaster of nation building in Iraq" occurred when President Obama removed all U.S. troops from the country in 2011, against the advice of his military advisers and at a time when the country was calm and stable ("Republican...

  • Confronting terrorism requires force

    Confronting terrorism requires force

    Regarding Barbara Risacher's recent letter on the war on terror, the least attractive option is to fail to respond forcibly to terror — a view the writer apparently favors ("New thinking in war on terror," Feb. 26).

Comments
Loading

79°