Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

We can't trust Iran, but war is not inevitable [Letter]

Should we trust the Iranian government? No — nor should we totally trust any other government. I always remember President Reagan's statement about Russia when he said "trust but verify" ("The nuclear deal with Iran," Nov. 25).

I was born in Iran and lived there until I was 18 years old. I moved to the U.S. in 1978, and I have been an American citizen since 1987.

Should the current Iranian government be allowed to possess nuclear bombs? Should we abandon our ally Israel? Attack Iran and start yet another ground war in the Middle East? Definitely no to the first two, probably not to the third. Our economy could crash again as it did in 2007 when we put so much of this country's resources into Iraq and Afghanistan.

Should we snub the Iranian government and have French, Russian, and Chinese middlemen take care of our business? That's not advisable. Not only do we take care of our own problems, we are also the only ones who really care about our own destiny.

Should we trust Israel's claim that Iran is ready to bomb it, thus supporting Israel's proposed attack on Iranian's suspected nuclear sites? Not unless we are naive enough to believe that American lives and properties will not be affected, either directly or indirectly. We have gone down this road before by providing "unconditional" support to Israel in the past four decades.

Should we increase the economic severity of sanctions on Iran, so they get on their knees and come to the negotiation table with a better offer? Not quite sure about that one, but we do know the following:

Sanctions have only harmed average Iranian people while allowing the government to increase the country's uranium enrichment facilities six-fold.

Cornering any nation and pushing it to its breaking point may backfire. America is not in a position to allocate its blood and treasure on the basis of hot-headed politicians bent on policing the world. Our greatest competitor and nemesis is China, and it would love to see us bogged down in more foreign military entanglement so they can dominate our last viable industry — space technology.

The newly elected President Hassan Rouhani of Iran is a moderate who was cooperating with the Western governments back in early 2000, when he served under President Khatami, the most-known moderate official in Iran.

Mr. Rouhani had been opposing the hard-liner government of former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad throughout the Green Movement revolution in 2008. Additionally, he currently is taking heavy political shots at home from hot-headed politicians opposing the agreement with the United States.

I certainly understand the culture of the mistrust between the U.S. and Iran but I also understand that we are Americans and our only concern should be American lives and prosperity. Being hot-headed, staying behind-the-scenes, and allowing others decide our fate is not the right thing for America.

Let's stick with our six-month interim agreement with Iran and keep our eyes and ears open for 100 percent verification of the facts. And we should remember a few words of advice: "Keep your trusted friends close, but keep your mistrusted partners even closer."

Reza Kaliush

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Cardin, Mikulski should stand up to Obama and reject Iran deal

    Cardin, Mikulski should stand up to Obama and reject Iran deal

    Contrary to the letter "Ben Cardin needs to make up his mind and support the Iran deal" (Aug. 5), this is the time for Sens. Ben Cardin and Barbara Mikulski to demonstrate that they are a statesman and stateswoman respectively and not simply political supporters of President Barack Obama. Their...

  • Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Under normal circumstances, Congress should not get involved in preliminary treaty negotiations, since it has the option of refusing to pass the document by not mustering a two-thirds vote of approval.

  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as their new deadline. Iran says there will be no extension if a deal...

  • Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Unfortunately, the skilled Iranian negotiators have already won the game against a concession-minded P5-1 array of nations headed by the United States ("Iran's dangerous game," June 5). With funds now flowing into Iran and even more lucrative trade agreements being discussed with that nation, Iran...

  • Iran deal offers hope

    Iran deal offers hope

    When the Iran deal was announced by Secretary of State John Kerry, I was elated that the negotiators were at last able to reach a reasonable agreement. While some people are asking that we hold out for more, I agree with those who say that we have moved Iran as far as we can move her at this time...

  • Don't compare Israel to Iran

    Don't compare Israel to Iran

    To the letter writer who stated that Iran is in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, I have the proverbial bridge I wish to sell him ("Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks," June 15). What nonsense!

  • Shouldn't we read the Iran deal before supporting it?

    Shouldn't we read the Iran deal before supporting it?

    I find it un-American that your paper and many in Congress can apparently make a decision to agree with the proposed Iran nuclear deal without reading it or knowing what the side agreements the UN made contain. You are all taking the word of people that have a record of distorting the facts or...

Comments
Loading
81°