Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Who are we to say no to Iran's nukes?

Let's ask the right question. When, exactly, did the U.S.A. become "the decider" for which countries can possess the complete nuclear fuel cycle?

Seems like déjà vu all over again for a run-up to war with Iran. Will the media please do their job: asking the right questions and demanding real answers, instead of buying in to political demagoguery.

John Kelly, Parkville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Thank you for your support for continuing negotiations in your July 17th "Keep talking with Iran" editorial. U.S. and Iranian negotiators agreed to continue the talks through late November due to the progress they have made already toward peacefully resolving the standoff over Iran's nuclear program....

  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as their new deadline. Iran says there will be no extension if a deal...

  • Obama foolish to write Khamenei

    Obama foolish to write Khamenei

    To make matters regarding the negotiations with Iran over its nuclear and missile program even worse than what was described by Cal Thomas ("U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce," Nov. 8), it is now known that President Barack Obama chose to contact Ayatollah Khamenei during that time.

  • Keep talking with Iran

    Keep talking with Iran

    The announcement today that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend talks over Tehran's disputed nuclear program is far short of what we might have hoped for. But the extension can't be counted as a failure either. If the goal is to keep up the pressure on Iran's leaders to reach a deal, keeping...

  • Iran talks peace while it builds its bomb

    Iran talks peace while it builds its bomb

    Unfortunately, the U.S. and Iran's decision to extend their nuclear talks with a new deadline of June, 2015, will only give Iran the opportunity to further its nuclear and ballistic missile programs unhindered ("Keep talking with Iran," Nov. 24).

  • Iran's true purpose is clear

    Iran's true purpose is clear

    Adil Shamoo's recent commentary ("Netanyahu wants war," March 4) ignores the inconvenient truth that for years, Iranian leaders have been calling to "wipe Israel off the map of the Earth" as well as promising "death to America."

  • Most agree that Iran deal looks bad

    Most agree that Iran deal looks bad

    I believe that The Sun should be focusing on what Secretary of State John Kerry and President Barack Obama have accomplished with their ongoing negotiations with Iran over its nuclear weapons ambitions ("Netanyahu's pointless speech," March 3).

  • Sanctions were working in Iran; why are we letting up?

    Sanctions were working in Iran; why are we letting up?

    It seems to me that the sanctions levied on Iran were working or they would not be at the negotiating table ("Netanyahu's pointless speech," March 3). Maybe if we continue this policy, instead of the one we seem to be embracing, they would give up their nuclear program. This is just North Korea...

Comments
Loading
81°