Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Iran won't change its ways no matter how much pressure is applied

While any sane person hopes that war with Iran can be avoided, The Sun's plan for averting such a conflict is misguided ("Nuclear saber-rattling," Jan. 6).

The plan is unethical because it asks the U.S. to betray its own democratic ideals by recognizing the legitimacy of a fundamentalist regime ruled autocratically by clerics who systematically violate the human rights of their own citizens.

The plan is dangerous because by committing the U.S. to work to create a nuclear-free Mideast, it threatens to undermineIsrael'spurely defensive nuclear weapons program, which is essential to the security it needs in a hostile region.

The plan is delusional because it expects Iran to abandon policies like supporting terrorists, arming the Taliban, threatening Israel and pursuing nuclear weapons which are based upon deeply held, theological views about Islam, Iran and the West.

Finally, the plan is inaccurate because it claims that the major obstacle to an accommodation between the U.S. and Iran is the "history of mutual hostility" between the two countries, thereby suggesting some degree of American culpability.

In fact, the current crisis is solely the result of the destructive course adopted by the mullahs and their enablers, and they alone can opt to end it.

Jay Bernstein, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Cardin, Mikulski should stand up to Obama and reject Iran deal

    Cardin, Mikulski should stand up to Obama and reject Iran deal

    Contrary to the letter "Ben Cardin needs to make up his mind and support the Iran deal" (Aug. 5), this is the time for Sens. Ben Cardin and Barbara Mikulski to demonstrate that they are a statesman and stateswoman respectively and not simply political supporters of President Barack Obama. Their...

  • Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Under normal circumstances, Congress should not get involved in preliminary treaty negotiations, since it has the option of refusing to pass the document by not mustering a two-thirds vote of approval.

  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as their new deadline. Iran says there will be no extension if a deal...

  • Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Unfortunately, the skilled Iranian negotiators have already won the game against a concession-minded P5-1 array of nations headed by the United States ("Iran's dangerous game," June 5). With funds now flowing into Iran and even more lucrative trade agreements being discussed with that nation, Iran...

  • Iran deal offers hope

    Iran deal offers hope

    When the Iran deal was announced by Secretary of State John Kerry, I was elated that the negotiators were at last able to reach a reasonable agreement. While some people are asking that we hold out for more, I agree with those who say that we have moved Iran as far as we can move her at this time...

  • Don't compare Israel to Iran

    Don't compare Israel to Iran

    To the letter writer who stated that Iran is in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, I have the proverbial bridge I wish to sell him ("Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks," June 15). What nonsense!

  • Shouldn't we read the Iran deal before supporting it?

    Shouldn't we read the Iran deal before supporting it?

    I find it un-American that your paper and many in Congress can apparently make a decision to agree with the proposed Iran nuclear deal without reading it or knowing what the side agreements the UN made contain. You are all taking the word of people that have a record of distorting the facts or...

Comments
Loading
73°